Jeff Doctor

Jeff Doctor

@jeff.doctor

Cayuga Nation citizen, Six Nations of the Grand River Territory | he/him | Impact Strategist @ https://animikii.com/ | #LandBack - #CashBack - #DataBack | Find me @ https://jeff.doctor/

3.4K followers3.1K following4.1K posts

bringing up the eternal Indian Act debate is the easiest way to distract and divide us so kudos to that I suppose

meanwhile... "Doerkson has stated that repealing B.C.’s Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous People Act, or DRIPA, will be his highest priority. During his acceptance speech, Doerkson said he would also protect private property and ensure parks would stay open for all B.C. residents" cooooool 🫠

thetyee.caDoerkson Condemns White Supremacist Legislature Stunt | The TyeeBC’s new Conservative premier says his party will act with ‘every part of the law we can’ to fight hate.

"Kinew said he raised the issue with Prime Minister Mark Carney earlier Monday, calling it 'long overdue that we have a relationship with Indigenous Peoples in Canada that reflects who we are as Canadians today.'" um, not all of us wanna be Canadian, bro

View full thread

apparently this is what working at proton is like too

KetAnthropic JoshAI@ketanjoshi.co

The first genuinely honest ad for generative AI I've ever seen, from Microsoft / CoPilot A mediocre white guy sees his non-white colleague getting praised for good work, he asks AI to *literally copy it*, and then he gets all the praise instead: www.ispot.tv/ad/SoDi/micr...

Jeff Doctor reposted

the idea of some random guy making his chatbot write a press release about how his chatbot is a bad employee then emailing it to a bunch of journalists is still cracking me up, it’s so good. I really liked this one

Jason Koebler@jasonkoebler.bsky.social

The wildest one of these I got was a three PDF "press release" rollout from someone who said his ChatGPT sometimes got something wrong and that OpenAI didn't respond to his support ticket and fashioned himself as a kind of big tech whistleblower

Claude developers Thariq Shihipar and Anthony Morris posted 2 days ago on twitter that they left Anthropic? I can't see anything verifying this, so wtf? If if was working on the most valuable product in the multiverse I dunno if I'd quit right before an IPO made me a quadrazillionaire... unless?

ibtimes.sgIs Anthropic Facing an Employee Exodus? OpenAI's Sam Altman Says 'This Is Not a Good Sign'Two Claude Code builders have left Anthropic within a day, fueling questions about a possible employee exodus as OpenAI CEO Sam Altman calls the departures "not a good sign."
View full thread

Jeff Doctor reposted

Jeff Doctor reposted

I wrote about how two bugs in PHP almost burned the internet to the ground, why it broadly hasn't (yet), but how the PHP-ocalypse is likely to be the first in a wave of aging internet tech that *will* inevitably break — it's a matter of time. Bypass for ad-blockers: web.archive.org/web/20261026...

techcrunch.comPHP-ocalypse: How two critical web bugs almost broke the internet | TechCrunchTwo critical bugs in the PHP web programming language, used by the majority of the internet, threatened to upend the internet — and it's unlikely to be the last major software scare.

Jeff Doctor reposted

sorry it's very funny to post an S-1 that basically describes how you're developing a digital superintelligence tantamount to a god while also not doing optical character recognition on your co-founders' 8-page letter that opens it

Claude developers Thariq Shihipar and Anthony Morris posted 2 days ago on twitter that they left Anthropic? I can't see anything verifying this, so wtf? If if was working on the most valuable product in the multiverse I dunno if I'd quit right before an IPO made me a quadrazillionaire... unless?

ibtimes.sgIs Anthropic Facing an Employee Exodus? OpenAI's Sam Altman Says 'This Is Not a Good Sign'Two Claude Code builders have left Anthropic within a day, fueling questions about a possible employee exodus as OpenAI CEO Sam Altman calls the departures "not a good sign."

I'm curious how 🇨🇦 forcing "core providers" (undefined) and "electronic service providers" (almost any business or organization) isn't a violation of UNDRIP by not only forcing Indigenous Peoples to govern their data in certain ways, but also forcing "lawful" (whose laws?) access to Indigenous data.

Jeff Doctor@jeff.doctor

"Amid criticism over the lack of clarity about the scope of metadata that could be retained, the Minister of Public Safety promised on May 27, 2026, that the government would amend C-22 to clarify what metadata must be stored under the Bill. This promise never materialized."

View full thread

The general public may have forgotten about the momentum that many social movements were building prior to the pandemic, but the government surely hasn't, neither have investors. They want their investments guaranteed, and the Carney government is their backstop both financially and through force.

We're all getting screwed by Bill C-22, but some people are going to be harmed first as an example for the rest of us to "get in line". It's not a coincidence either that "Truth and Reconciliation" is now only "economic reconciliation"... that the term "partnerships" has replaced the term "rights"

I'm curious how 🇨🇦 forcing "core providers" (undefined) and "electronic service providers" (almost any business or organization) isn't a violation of UNDRIP by not only forcing Indigenous Peoples to govern their data in certain ways, but also forcing "lawful" (whose laws?) access to Indigenous data.

Jeff Doctor@jeff.doctor

"Amid criticism over the lack of clarity about the scope of metadata that could be retained, the Minister of Public Safety promised on May 27, 2026, that the government would amend C-22 to clarify what metadata must be stored under the Bill. This promise never materialized."

View full thread

Surveillance isn't just about "privacy", it's about changing behavior. Making people scared to communicate, organize, trust each other... arresting people after the fact based on dodgy digital "evidence"... Stopping people from showing up due to fears of being swept up in a digital dragnet... etc.

It's not a coincidence that Bill C-22 is being forced through alongside so many other bills that undermine everyone's rights. It's not just Indigenous people getting targeted here, anyone who resists this union of big business and the state will be deemed a "threat" and treated accordingly.

I'm curious how 🇨🇦 forcing "core providers" (undefined) and "electronic service providers" (almost any business or organization) isn't a violation of UNDRIP by not only forcing Indigenous Peoples to govern their data in certain ways, but also forcing "lawful" (whose laws?) access to Indigenous data.

Jeff Doctor@jeff.doctor

"Amid criticism over the lack of clarity about the scope of metadata that could be retained, the Minister of Public Safety promised on May 27, 2026, that the government would amend C-22 to clarify what metadata must be stored under the Bill. This promise never materialized."

View full thread

Canada loves talking about "keeping Canadians safe"... but from who exactly? Who counts as a "threat" to "national security" in a settler colony? HMMMM I WONDER

Canadian law enforcement looks really bad when they gear up and invade Indigenous territory to enforce Canadian "major projects". It's not a good look either for "investors" who are weary about project delays. So how can they dissuade people from defending their territories? Surveillance of course.

I'm curious how 🇨🇦 forcing "core providers" (undefined) and "electronic service providers" (almost any business or organization) isn't a violation of UNDRIP by not only forcing Indigenous Peoples to govern their data in certain ways, but also forcing "lawful" (whose laws?) access to Indigenous data.

Jeff Doctor@jeff.doctor

"Amid criticism over the lack of clarity about the scope of metadata that could be retained, the Minister of Public Safety promised on May 27, 2026, that the government would amend C-22 to clarify what metadata must be stored under the Bill. This promise never materialized."

View full thread

I haven't seen any legal analysis or political talking points that address this obvious (to me, at least) structural flaw in the bill. Further, this approach of "trust us, bro" that the Carney government is taking doesn't work well when there is absolutely no trust between our governments.

And this is in addition to the fact that Indigenous Peoples are criminalized at obscene rates in Canada, especially in relation to resisting major projects that are in the Canadian "national interest"... so who do you think this bill will disproportionately target?

I'm curious how 🇨🇦 forcing "core providers" (undefined) and "electronic service providers" (almost any business or organization) isn't a violation of UNDRIP by not only forcing Indigenous Peoples to govern their data in certain ways, but also forcing "lawful" (whose laws?) access to Indigenous data.

Jeff Doctor@jeff.doctor

"Amid criticism over the lack of clarity about the scope of metadata that could be retained, the Minister of Public Safety promised on May 27, 2026, that the government would amend C-22 to clarify what metadata must be stored under the Bill. This promise never materialized."

For example, what would happen if the feds tried to enforce the C-22 regime on an Indigenous "core provider" or "electronic service provider" such as an ISP, business, non-profit organization, or even a First Nations government? I bet that would spark a legal fight real quick...

There's absolutely no carve-out (or even token mention) in the bill to respect Indigenous rights to self-determination which include the right to data sovereignty... Simply put, what right do the feds have to determine how Indigenous Peoples govern our data, much less access them?

Jeff Doctor reposted

The Senate is expected to refer Bill C-22 to committee for further study soon. It's been encouraging to see Senators speaking up about the importance of strong #encryption and getting this legislation right. Here are a few highlights from the debate (so far). 👇

"Amid criticism over the lack of clarity about the scope of metadata that could be retained, the Minister of Public Safety promised on May 27, 2026, that the government would amend C-22 to clarify what metadata must be stored under the Bill. This promise never materialized."

ablawg.caDecrypting Bill C-22, Part 2: Keeping Tabs: C-22 and the Year (Now Half-Year) of Metadata RetentionBy: Alexandra Lyn, Joel Reardon, and Michael Nesbitt Legislation Commented On: Bill C-22, An Act respecting lawful access, 1st Sess, 45th Parl, 2026 (as passed by the House of Commons 18 June 2026)…

"Former NSA and CIA director Michael Hayden famously said: 'We kill people based on metadata.' Aggregated metadata can be used to build a complete picture of a person. Section 5(2)(d) could ostensibly capture the metadata of almost every member of Canadian society."

ablawg.caDecrypting Bill C-22, Part 2: Keeping Tabs: C-22 and the Year (Now Half-Year) of Metadata RetentionBy: Alexandra Lyn, Joel Reardon, and Michael Nesbitt Legislation Commented On: Bill C-22, An Act respecting lawful access, 1st Sess, 45th Parl, 2026 (as passed by the House of Commons 18 June 2026)…

Jeff Doctor reposted

Replying to @jasonkoebler.bsky.social

Security through obscurity is a terrible principle but in practice a lot of things didn't get hacked bc people ignored them, or didn't know they existed, or just generally got missed. AI makes it easy to probe all of these things at scale + makes it easier to find/develop exploits