IntelArchive

IntelArchive

@intelarchive.io

Sharing publications, events, conferences, and calls for papers from the most comprensive database on intelligence studies, IntelArchive: Intelligence Studies Database (https://intelarchive.io/). Proudly sponsored by @kcsi.uk.

1.5K followers5 following1.8K posts

Pinned

🚨 IntelArchive has been updated with new features, including author profiles, shareable links, individual publication pages, and improved search. We also now send a weekly digest listing new additions to the database. Join our Google Group to receive updates: groups.google.com/g/intelarchi...

New addition Journal article: International politics: special issue of the journal of international politics on private sector geopolitical and security intelligence by Angela Miller Lewis et al. (published 17-10-2026) https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-026-00827-9

doi.orgInternational politics: special issue of the journal of international politics on private sector geopolitical and security intelligence - International PoliticsAbstract As corporations and other private sector organizations increasingly navigate and shape international politics, intelligence capabilities have become critical to understanding geopolitical and security risks and informing organizational decision-making. Despite its long history and growing significance, private sector intelligence remains an under examined field of scholarly inquiry, with limited conceptual clarity and a fragmented body of literature. This introduction situates private sector security intelligence within the broader study of international politics, distinguishing it from competitive intelligence, government intelligence contracting, and other adjacent domains. It introduces the contributions to this special issue, which bring together scholarly and practitioner perspectives to examine the field's evolving professional identity, methodologies, organizational structures, applications, and ethical considerations. Collectively, these contributions illuminate the distinctive characteristics and challenges of intelligence conducted by and for private sector organizations, while identifying opportunities for further research. In doing so, the special issue seeks to advance conceptual clarity, encourage systematic scholarly inquiry, and support the continued professionalization of private sector intelligence as a distinct domain of study and practice.

New addition Journal article: An integrated passive reconnaissance and OSINT correlation framework for unified cyber intelligence gathering by Y. Manohar Reddy, Muniraju Naidu Vadlamudi (published 11-10-2026) https://doi.org/10.1007/s44354-026-00051-0

doi.orgAn integrated passive reconnaissance and OSINT correlation framework for unified cyber intelligence gathering - Discover NetworksPassive reconnaissance has become increasingly significant in helping analysts obtain intelligence about target systems without directly interacting with them. Open-Source Intelligence (OSINT) provides valuable information that can support security assessment, cyber investigation, and forensic analysis. However, information obtained from multiple sources is often redundant, fragmented, and represented in different formats. In this research, an Integrated Passive Reconnaissance and OSINT Correlation Framework is proposed to integrate information gathered from multiple passive intelligence sources, including WHOIS, DNS enumeration, search engine footprinting, and network path analysis. The framework performs information collection, normalization, entity correlation, and consolidation to generate a unified intelligence profile. Through entity correlation across different intelligence sources, the proposed framework reduces redundant information and improves the completeness and consistency of the gathered intelligence. To evaluate the framework, experiments were conducted using publicly available domain-related data. The collected information was processed to assess the framework’s capability to gather, normalize, correlate, and organize intelligence obtained from different OSINT sources. The evaluation used a dataset comprising 1,781 instances and 12 intelligence attributes extracted from multiple reconnaissance sources. The results achieved an attribute availability rate of 90.11% and demonstrated the generation of unified intelligence profiles from the collected reconnaissance information. The findings indicate that integrating heterogeneous passive reconnaissance sources can provide a more complete and structured representation of target intelligence, thereby reducing the manual effort required to consolidate information from multiple sources. The proposed framework provides a foundation for more efficient cyber intelligence gathering and can be extended in future work by incorporating additional OSINT sources and advanced correlation techniques.

New addition Thesis: Were the state’s intelligence activities during th... by Eleanor L. Williams (published 01-10-2026) https://orr.qub.ac.uk/articles/thesis/Were_the_state_s_intelligence_activities_during_the_conflicts_in_Northern_Ireland_1969-1998_and_Colombia_1978-2016_ethical_/32634309/1

orr.qub.ac.ukWere the state’s intelligence activities during the conflicts in Northern Ireland (1969-1998) and Colombia (1978-2016) ethical?The Northern Irish and Colombian conflicts are used as case studies internationally regarding how to combat terrorism. Nonetheless, key questions remain unanswered: how did state intelligence combat terrorism? Was this effort conducted ethically? This study uses Omand and Phythian’s Just Intelligence framework to analyse the ethicality of the state’s intelligence activities conducted in the Northern Irish (1969-1998) and Colombian (1978-2016) conflicts. It suggests that most state intelligence activities carried out during the Northern Irish and Colombian conflicts were ethical. State intelligence in both cases were least ethical at the beginning of conflicts, and in both cases the state behaved more ethically as the conflicts progressed. It emerges that some state intelligence agencies acted more ethically than others. However, the big questions are, why was this? Why was there a variation? Why did some actors behave more ethically than others? Why were there more ethical periods at different points of each conflict? Why did different state organisations do different things? This research argues that the ethicality of activities varied in both conflicts primarily because of a lack of guidance; lack of coordination between intelligence agencies; nuanced approaches regarding how to approach terrorism between different arms of the state; intentionally correcting behaviour and learning from mistakes; and political factors. The conclusions of this thesis matter for those studying the ethics of intelligence because practically it provides greater understanding of intelligence’s role in countering terrorism. Furthermore, it proves that some unethical intelligence procedures exacerbate conflicts and hinder peace processes from occurring. Therefore, it is necessary to revaluate how governments confront terrorism. Especially as, rightly or wrongly, the Northern Irish and Colombian conflicts are used as case studies internationally regarding how to combat terrorism. This thesis highlights the right lessons which should be drawn from the Northern Irish and Colombian cases. Thesis is embargoed until 31 July 2028.