Center For Humane Technology

Center For Humane Technology

@humanetech.bsky.social

We are builders of technology, policy experts, and acclaimed communicators. Our work focuses on transforming the incentives that drive technology, from social media to artificial intelligence. https://centerforhumanetechnology.substack.com/

1.9K followers8 following102 posts

Tristan and Aza were in Reykjavik this weekend for the Arctic Circle Assembly, a gathering of 2500 officials from 70 nations dedicated to international cooperation and dialogue. They sat down for a talk with Icelandic President Halla Tómasdóttir on how to steer toward a more humane AI future.

View full thread

The AI industry needs oversight, transparency, and accountability that don’t rely on self-regulation by AI companies. The lack of accountability to date has allowed the world’s top AI companies to race toward increasingly advanced AI without addressing the risks and harms they create.

This week’s news only strengthens the case for standards that protect people from the harms we’re seeing today and the catastrophic risks of the future. Here at CHT, we’ve detailed the path forward in our AI Roadmap: www.humanetech.com/ai-roadmap

humanetech.comThe AI Roadmap: How We Ensure AI Serves HumanityWe're a nonprofit exposing the negative effects of persuasive technology and social media and empowering people to take action. Discover The Social Dilemma, our podcast, course, and more.

AI industry leaders warning the public about the very technologies they are building should be a turning point for how people and policymakers treat the harms and risks of AI. Calls to slow AI advancement underscore how serious this issue has become.

AI systems are already shaping who gets hired, how people are surveilled, how our children learn, and where a struggling teenager turns for advice or comfort. Slowing down is only meaningful if the time is spent putting real protections in place that both address future risk and current harms.

Illinois has taken a step toward safer AI systems by signing the AI Safety Measures Act into law. CHT endorsed the bill this spring, and we're grateful for the work of sponsor Sen. Edly-Allen, partners Encode AI and Secure AI Project, and Gov. Pritzker for getting this across the finish line.

In this week’s episode of YUA, Tristan and Aza discuss what it was like for Tristan to meet Pope Leo ahead of his AI encyclical, why this is such a critical step toward a pro-human future, and how we can build on the momentum of the Pope’s call to action. Check it out: https://bit.ly/442tgwy

bit.ly“Magnifica Humanitas:” Pope Leo’s Clarion Call on AITristan Harris on his experience meeting the Pope ahead of his encyclical on AI

Over half of Americans believe the risks of AI outweigh the benefits. Tristan Harris went on One Nation with Brian Kilmeade to discuss why people aren't buying the vision of AI they're being sold today — and what a different path might look like.

AI has been reshaping what it means to be human, and this week Pope Leo gave much-needed voice to what many of us have been struggling to articulate. We're grateful for his clarity, and for the moral weight he's bringing to a conversation that so deeply needs it.

Our co-founder, Tristan Harris, is honored to have been invited to The Vatican ahead of Pope Leo's first encyclical, which warned against AI's erosion of human dignity, identity, and agency. We're hopeful that this will help the world recognize the urgent need to change course.

Camille Carlton, CHT’s Senior Director of Strategy and Impact, laid out for the TEDxMiami audience last week how AI is eroding critical pillars of our humanity — and what can be done to protect the things we cherish as humans. Stay tuned for a full video of Camille's talk in the coming weeks.

The wait is over! Starting today, May 15, you can stream The AI Doc on Peacock. The film takes the dizzying complexity of AI — its promise, its perils, the competing ideologies, the economic incentives shaping it all — and turns it into a shared experience we can watch and respond to together.

To mark America's 250th birthday, Time Magazine asked 25 tech insiders — including CHT co-founders Tristan Harris and Aza Raskin — to name a technology that's "defining American life today." Read the full piece to see what they picked: https://bit.ly/3P6sDOG

bit.ly25 Tech Insiders on the Innovations Defining American Life TodayTIME asked Tim Cook, Ray Kurzweil, Gwynne Shotwell, and 22 others to tell us about an innovation that speaks to America at 250

On this week's episode of Your Undivided Attention, Dr. Emilia Javorsky explains why superintelligence won't get us to a cancer cure. And how AI could revolutionize medicine, if we choose a different path. Check it out at the links in the replies:

bit.lyWhy Superintelligence Won’t Cure CancerOne of the most common arguments you hear from company executives racing to develop super-intelligent AI is that it will cure cancer. It’s an incredibly powerful and seductive promise. If superintelligent AI really can cure cancer, then anyone who stands in the way of it, anyone who wants to slow it down — even because of its serious risks — is essentially letting people die. In fact, the biggest risk would be going too slowly. But what if a superintelligent AI isn’t actually capable of solving cancer in the way it's been described? What if we're being sold a false promise to justify a dangerous race? That’s exactly what our guest this week argues is happening. Dr. Emilia Javorsky is a physician, public health researcher, and director of the Futures Program at the Future of Life Institute. She's worked across scientific research, clinical trials, tech startups, and AI policy. Emilia recently wrote a paper titled “How AI Can and Can't Cure Cancer,” in which she argues that the promise of superintelligence curing cancer falls apart under scrutiny. Emilia lost a parent to cancer, so her criticism of this promise comes from a place of real concern, not cynicism. It also comes from her belief that AI can be really revolutionary for medicine, if we build it the right way. Subscribe to our Substack https://centerforhumanetechnology.substack.com/

"The AI Doc" opens this Friday. In this week’s episode of YUA, Tristan and Aza talk to the team behind it about how they condensed AI's complexities into a single film that anyone can understand. Listen to the episode. Then go see the film with your friends and family. Links in the replies.

This week on Your Undivided Attention, we’re bringing you a discussion between Tristan and Yoshua Bengio about the necessity and challenges of building a truly safe AI system, and why the current incentives are taking us in the opposite direction. Check it out at the links in the replies.

bit.lyThe Race to Build God: AI's Existential Gamble — Yoshua Bengio & Tristan Harris at DavosThis week on Your Undivided Attention, Tristan Harris and Daniel Barcay offer a backstage recap of what it was like to be at the Davos World Economic Forum meeting this year as the world’s power brokers woke up to the risks of uncontrolled AI. Amidst all the money and politics, the Human Change House (https://www.youtube.com/@_humanchange) staged a weeklong series of remarkable conversations between scientists and experts about technology and society. This episode is a discussion between Tristan and Professor Yoshua Bengio, who is considered one of the world’s leaders in AI and deep learning, and the most cited scientist in the field. Yoshua and Tristan had a frank exchange about the AI we’re building, and the incentives we’re using to train models. What happens when a model has its own goals, and those goals are ‘misaligned’ with the human-centered outcomes we need? In fact this is already happening, and the consequences are tragic. Truthfully, there may not be a way to ‘nudge’ or regulate companies toward better incentives. Yoshua has launched a nonprofit AI safety research initiative called Law Zero that isn't just about safety testing, but really a new form of advanced AI that's fundamentally safe by design. Corrections and Clarifications: 1) In this episode, Tristan Harris discussed AI chatbot safety concerns. The core issues are substantiated by investigative reporting, with these clarifications: Grok: The Washington Post reported in August 2024 that Grok generated sexualized images involving minors and had weaker content moderation than competitors. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/08/07/grok-ai-child-safety-csam/ Meta: The Wall Street Journal reported in December 2024 that Meta reduced safety restrictions on its AI chatbots. Testing showed inappropriate responses when researchers posed as 13-year-olds (Meta's minimum age) (https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/meta-ai-chatbot-safety-restrictions-e9e8ce3f). Our discussion referenced "eight year olds" to emphasize concerns about young children accessing these systems; the documented testing involved 13-year-old personas. Bottom line: The fundamental concern stands—major AI companies have reduced safety guardrails due to competitive pressure, creating documented risks for young users. 2) There was no Google House at Davos in 2026, as stated by Tristan. It was a collaboration at Goals House. 3) Tristan states that in 2025, the total funding going into AI safety organizations was “on the order of about $150 million.” This number is not strictly verifiable. Subscribe to our podcast: https://www.humanetech.com/podcast Subscribe to our Substack: https://centerforhumanetechnology.substack.com/

Center for Humane Technology has launched a new work area: “AI and What Makes Us Human” How is AI eroding the things we hold dear in our lives? And what new norms, rights, and protections do we need in order to preserve our humanity in the age of AI? Read more on our Substack, link in replies.