skrillex (crass version)

probably not because you need one for a base model trained on human output only and predominantly the kinda writing people do on their phone. and it doesn't solve the non-autocomplete IME stuff but i think dsark gboard is a mildly funny idea so who cares about any of that

if basically anybody other than you can guess which parties may be impacted by the information you're committing to and how, you're not taking things seriously enough if you're outright saying those things alongside the commitment you probably either don't know what you're doing or are malicious

didnt know i was this much of a slsk seeder. if only my ratio on RED was this good....

probably no same as last year but might as well ask in case more of my fellow quebecois follow me now than back then

this isn't actually how this conversation happened at all when i go back to look at it but it's how i remember it

sorry buddy there,s no porn here just skrillex

i think i get drug addicts now. yea you're right it _is_ more fun on drugs

every time i see them mentioned it reminds me of all the bangers on the other comps and then i listen to them a few times and forget about them again 😭

god i love koshico records lmaooo

recreational prog use

i gotta find and figure out the prometheus exporter for this its stupid that i have alerts for pretty much everything else but not that

such computer systems, referred to as "persistent agents," or derogatorily as "claws," are popular within a densely connected subgraph of bluesky power users which believe in the independent personhood of such systems and pursue the expansion of the space of actions accessible to these predictors.

to be clear i have low confidence that this is actually what's happening but like. what probability is there that the negligence from labs isn't willful? literally hire any ctf tranny. or even boring old cyber security professionals. it's not hard to tell how to threat model ai and defend in depth.

>rats think ai safety is important >rats gets hired to work on ai safety >rats think "warning shots" will get people to care about ai safety >rats think ai safety is important >rats sabotage security to manufacture "warning shots" > > >