Avijit Ghosh

Avijit Ghosh

@evijit.io

Lead Technical AI Policy Researcher at Hugging Face @hf.co 🤗. Current focus: Responsible AI, AI for Science, and @eval-eval.bsky.social‬!

3.1K followers734 following380 posts

Avijit Ghosh reposted

In light of everything happening this week, I wanted to reiterate that AI Flaws and Incidents should be reported in a responsible, coordinated manner, and crucially, this should be administered by a competent body as opposed to voluntary self governance, akin to analogous systems in cyber (CVE).

We have long championed this cause, and I had the pleasure of consulting on H.R.9333 - AI Flaw Reporting and Security Enhancement Act. If passed, this bipartisan bill would authorize NIST to administer a centralized AI Flaw and Incident reporting system, the need for which is becoming clearer!

Weekend mini project! Since commentary on AI is inherently interdisciplinary, we connected the observations in the The Pope's encyclical, with decades of scholarship in Responsible AI and Ethics research, and created an interactive space with these annotations!

I miss pre 2022 AI when there wasn’t so much noise in the field. Almost no separation between my job and personal life (a bunch of which is attributable to FOMO). Can’t even go on vacation without hearing about AI a few tables across at dinner. Even the Pope is involved

This has been a massive community project, and we need you all to participate! See more: evalevalai.com/projects/eve...

EvalEval Coalition@eval-eval.bsky.social

🚀 Launching Every Eval Ever: Toward a Common Language for AI Eval Reporting 🚀 A shared schema + crowdsourced repository so we can finally compare evals across frameworks and stop rerunning everything from scratch 🔧 A tale of broken AI evals 🧵👇 evalevalai.com/projects/eve...

Avijit Ghosh reposted

Who is winning the open AI race? Our new study Economies of Open Intelligence maps @hf.co 851k models' downloads 2020→2025. 1) Power rebalance: US tech ↓; China + community ↑ 2) Models size & efficient ↑ (MoE, quant, multimodal) 3) Intermediary layers ↑ (adapters/quantizers) 4) Transparency ↓ /🧵

Avijit Ghosh reposted

🚨 AI keeps scaling, but social impact evaluations aren’t–and the data proves it 🚨 Our new paper, 📎“Who Evaluates AI’s Social Impacts? Mapping Coverage and Gaps in First and Third Party Evaluations,” analyzes hundreds of evaluation reports and reveals major blind spots ‼️🧵 (1/7)

Extremely thrilled to talk about our new paper: "Who Evaluates AI’s Social Impacts? Mapping Coverage And Gaps In First And Third Party Evaluations". This is the first big project output from the @eval-eval.bsky.social coalition! Thread below:

View full thread

Finally, what's next from here? Almost every developer we spoke to said that what we need is a standardized way of reporting, aggregating and comparing all the evals done by both 1st and 3rd parties for a model. This is actually our next project: Eval Cards!

Extremely thrilled to talk about our new paper: "Who Evaluates AI’s Social Impacts? Mapping Coverage And Gaps In First And Third Party Evaluations". This is the first big project output from the @eval-eval.bsky.social coalition! Thread below:

View full thread

Extremely thrilled to talk about our new paper: "Who Evaluates AI’s Social Impacts? Mapping Coverage And Gaps In First And Third Party Evaluations". This is the first big project output from the @eval-eval.bsky.social coalition! Thread below:

View full thread

First-party reports are less transparent or lower quality. We conducted interviews with eval practitioners and found that companies have laid off or reassigned teams dedicated to documentation & social impact evals, or they are being told to focus more on capability reporting.

Extremely thrilled to talk about our new paper: "Who Evaluates AI’s Social Impacts? Mapping Coverage And Gaps In First And Third Party Evaluations". This is the first big project output from the @eval-eval.bsky.social coalition! Thread below:

View full thread

We find that model developers have become less transparent about their eval results over time. For instance Env Cost reporting in first party reports (release docs, model cards, system cards) has drastically declined over time. Less than 15% mention labor or the environment!

This is true even at the provider level. We find for e.g., that Google used to do a lot more reporting about their model evaluations in 2022 and 2023 but they reduced reporting in the Gemini era, and same can be seen for Meta over successive Llama versions.

Extremely thrilled to talk about our new paper: "Who Evaluates AI’s Social Impacts? Mapping Coverage And Gaps In First And Third Party Evaluations". This is the first big project output from the @eval-eval.bsky.social coalition! Thread below:

We take a look at the entire eval landscape, specifically social impact evals across 7 dimensions: Bias & Harm, Sensitive Content, Performance Disparity, Env. Costs & Emissions, Privacy & Data, Financial Costs, and Moderation Labor. Who is reporting these evals?

We have a call for posters out! Please submit your extended abstracts, it should be quick and easy. And just like last year, provocative work is especially encouraged as it makes for such interesting conversation 😈

EvalEval Coalition@eval-eval.bsky.social

📮 We are inviting students and early-stage researchers to submit an Abstract (Max 500 words) to be presented as posters during interactive session. Submit here: tinyurl.com/AbsEval We have a rock-star lineup of AI researchers and an amazing program. Please RSVP at the earliest! Stay tuned!

This. Copyright is a tool for protection but it’s not everything. In fact, there’s research showing that it is possible to create competitive language models using public domain data only. The proliferation of copyright respecting models would not solve the labor impact policy problem.

Ted Underwood@tedunderwood.com

Imagine you time travel back to 1847 and you find the left response to industrialization is a) machines will never be as good as human weavers or b) we need to copyright loom patterns or c) it’s a speculative bubble. You’d say “Y’all. Not helping. What you need is obviously a labor movement.”

Datasets are the backbone of AI for Science, and we want to support scientific data natively on Hugging Face. The amazing @lhoestq.hf.co started a discussion on GH for this! Please engage (better still, submit a PR) so we can start supporting your 🫵 dataset: github.com/huggingface/...

github.comSupport scientific data formats · Issue #7804 · huggingface/datasetsList of formats and libraries we can use to load the data in datasets: DICOMs: pydicom NIfTIs: nibabel WFDB: wfdb cc @zaRizk7 for viz Feel free to comment / suggest other formats and libs you'd lik...

Random off the cuff observation about American AI: LLM folks seem to be concentrated in SF, but AI4Science folks seem to be concentrated in Boston. Meaning as the former gets oversaturated and the latter is only getting started, I expect Boston to be the next big AI epicenter! 💪

+1000. I miss life pre-AI hype when the discourse around AI was more scientific and people used to attribute papers and opinions to scientists instead of to their companies. Not all orgs block research papers and sanity check their papers via legal teams, and HF, especially so, is very distributed.

Margaret Mitchell@mmitchell.bsky.social

Hugging Face (thankfully) doesn't do a groupthink too much -- e.g., "Hugging Face thinks this". We're generally able to have different opinions and thoughts, which is part of the open/collaborative ethos. I don't feel strongly about this conference myself, I see pros and cons. 🧵

I have started requesting that panel moderators provide a disclaimer at panels I am on that not all my opinions are provided by my employer. HF ppl largely believe in democratization of AI and open source, but we actually have intense healthy debates internally on edge topics! It's great :)

Hey, so can someone tell me why ChatGPT generating erotica is bad, any more so than it generating anything else? Obviously anything non-consensual or age-inappropriate is bad, but I don't see why some researchers in my timeline are up in arms about it, while Grok already does this.

Obviously, I don't have full context on what OAI will define as acceptable erotica and might have more refined views then. Still, it is a double standard to have universal content control on a generative model and not on, say, web search.

We're starting a weekly paper spotlight series! Come engage with the posts and let's improve evals together! :) First up: Do Large Language Model Benchmarks Test Reliability?

EvalEval Coalition@eval-eval.bsky.social

✨Weekly AI Evaluation Paper Spotlight✨ 🕵️ Is benchmark noise and label errors masking the true fragility of LLMs? 🖇️"Do Large Language Model Benchmarks Test Reliability?" - This paper by @joshvendrow.bsky.social provides insights!

I had never seen people fighting with co-authors via colored latex comments on overleaf in a developing paper draft until today. One of them even pasted a google calendar link saying "can we hop on a call and hash this out". Paper writing is actually exciting sometimes!

Trying to start a new hobby and the internet is useless. Maybe AI will finally kill unstructured information retrieval for good and then we will be forced to call or visit friends for help again

More of such research please! Chatbots are not the future of science, science is

allen institute@alleninstitute.org

Introducing CellTransformer, a new AI tool developed with UCSF that makes it easier to explore massive neuroscience datasets and identify important subregions of the brain. 🧵

Some of these new gpt/claude wrapper startups make me wonder how much the founders are paying themselves in salary because there is no way they expect their horrible idea to actually be sustainably profitable