Eric Schwitzgebel

Eric Schwitzgebel

@eschwitz.bsky.social

Philosopher, UC Riverside. Father. Human.

5K followers484 following712 posts

An Argument for Vastly Many Observers Smaller than a Proton [abbreviated argument here; link to full-length blog post at end of thread] Assumption 1: The universe is infinite. Assumption 2: If the universe is infinite, complexity recurs at large scales. 1/3

Assumption 3: If the universe is infinite and complexity recurs at large scales, so do life and intelligence. Assumption 4: Given Assumptions 1-3, it would be an un-Copernican coincidence if we happened to occupy the smallest scale hosting intelligent observers. 2/3

Friends and readers: I have cancer. The type of cancer is not yet fully confirmed, but all signs point toward kidney cancer that has spread to my hips, back, and pleura. On the bright side, all my blood tests so far are normal, suggesting that the cancer is moving slowly, which is typical 1/4

View full thread

worried in light of last week's post about self-sacrifice with terminal diagnoses, I assure you that although my reflections at the time were more immediately personally relevant than they might have seemed, while I was awaiting results, those thoughts remain entirely 5/6

Friends and readers: I have cancer. The type of cancer is not yet fully confirmed, but all signs point toward kidney cancer that has spread to my hips, back, and pleura. On the bright side, all my blood tests so far are normal, suggesting that the cancer is moving slowly, which is typical 1/4

View full thread

continue to do what is important to me, and one of those important things is discussing philosophy through my blog and social media. I have been posting at least weekly on The Splintered Mind for more than twenty years, and I hope to continue to do so, though it is likely that I will start to 3/5

miss some weeks. I am inspired in part by the example of my dear departed friend, collaborator, and fellow blogger Helen De Cruz, who was so brave, open, and positive-spirited through her slow death by cancer -- at a younger age and with a worse prognosis than I. In case any of you are 4/5

Friends and readers: I have cancer. The type of cancer is not yet fully confirmed, but all signs point toward kidney cancer that has spread to my hips, back, and pleura. On the bright side, all my blood tests so far are normal, suggesting that the cancer is moving slowly, which is typical 1/4

of kidney cancers. There is no evidence yet that the cancer has spread to any vital organs, and I am not in imminent danger of death. With new treatments, I am hopeful that I have several good years, perhaps many good years, still in front of me. I do not plan to crawl in a hole. I will 2/4

The Appeal of (Semi-?) Biological Naturalism [link in thread] Biological naturalism about consciousness will, I predict, soon be hot. As AI systems start to look more and more like conscious or sentient entities, at least superficially, doubters will be increasingly drawn to 1/3

arguments against their consciousness. Especially appealing will be arguments that characterize consciousness specifically as a biological phenomenon, one that can't occur in ordinary, non-biological computer systems. In this post, I describe the structure of such arguments and their 2/3

New paper in draft! I've been working on this one since 2018, never satisfied, redrafting over and over. I'm sure it still needs considerable work, but I'm finally ready to circulate it. Walking the Walk Ethicists who advocate moral principles without trying to live by them will generally 1/4

View full thread

understand without living by it: A meat-eating professor who recommends vegetarianism will generally have only a thin grasp of the way of life they recommend. These limitations give us reason to discount the understanding of ethicists who don’t attempt to live by their principles, 4/5

New paper in draft! I've been working on this one since 2018, never satisfied, redrafting over and over. I'm sure it still needs considerable work, but I'm finally ready to circulate it. Walking the Walk Ethicists who advocate moral principles without trying to live by them will generally 1/4

have a deficient understanding of what they recommend, for two reasons. First, abstract mottos like “act on the maxim you can will to be a universal law”, “maximize good consequences”, or “be generous” lack specific practical content without an array of concrete examples to flesh them out. 2/4

For broad principles that can be lived by, everyday choices are generally the best source of such examples. Paragraph-length thought experiments are impoverished in comparison. Second, even a principle with fairly specific practical content, such as “don’t eat meat”, is difficult to fully 3/5

View full thread

Ethical AI? Aug 29: The Laws of Robotics and Other Ways AI Might Learn from Aug 30: Beam Me Up, Scotty! How Close Are We to Teleportation? Larry Niven (!) will be one of the other panelists on teleportation. Academic poster session Sunday evening, mine on AI and consciousness. 3/4

View full thread

Ethical AI? Aug 29: The Laws of Robotics and Other Ways AI Might Learn from Aug 30: Beam Me Up, Scotty! How Close Are We to Teleportation? Larry Niven (!) will be one of the other panelists on teleportation. Academic poster session Sunday evening, mine on AI and consciousness. 3/4

ericlinuskaplan.substack.com/p/kapknap-an... If you don't know Eric, he's a Berkeley Philosophy PhD who has been a screenwriter for Futurama, Big Bang Theory, David Letterman, and more. I'll also be on four other panels: Aug 27: Ethics of Space Research and Exploration Aug 29: What Is 2/4

ericlinuskaplan.substack.comKapknap Animation - Six Days to the Con!Love Me Cat Wants to Trap Me in a Song Labyrinth! And -- we announce a talk on “Alien and Robot Consciousness” with Eric Schwitzgebel!
View full thread
View full thread

play of empty mimicry. Genuine conscious experience might require something no AI system could possess for the foreseeable future – intricate biological processes, for example, that silicon chips could never replicate. The thesis of this Element is that we don't know. Science lags, while 4/5

thirty years – be as richly and meaningfully conscious as ordinary humans, or even more so, capable of genuine feeling, real self-knowledge, and a wide range of sensory, emotional, and cognitive experiences. In some arguably important respects, AI architectures are beginning to resemble the 2/4

architectures many consciousness scientists associate with conscious systems. Their outward behavior, especially their linguistic behavior, grows ever more humanlike. Alternatively, claims of imminent AI consciousness might be profoundly mistaken. Their seeming humanlikeness might be a shadow 3/5

Obfuscatory Philosophy as Intellectual Authoritarianism and Cowardice [link in thread] For philosophers who can convince readers to take them seriously, obfuscation yields three illegitimate benefits: (1) it intimidates the reader, donning a mantle of intellectual authority, 1/3

(2) disempowers critics by allowing criticisms to be called misinterpretation, (3) exerts fascination on the reader who enjoys the challenge of puzzling out the meaning. It’s braver and more egalitarian to make plain claims that can be proven wrong supported by plain 2/3