EightyGee (Athomas Goldberg)

EightyGee (Athomas Goldberg)

@eightygee.bsky.social

Artist, activist, and American ex-pat living in Canada, working for a better and brighter future and a more just and civil world for all

267 followers103 following251 posts

The market’s response to Trump’s obvious fabrication of “productive talks with Iran” marks a new turning point where people no longer question whether Trump is lying, but only what the lie is signaling - in this case that Trump is looking for an excuse to retreat from his latest fuck-up.

Some journalists have asked why Trump didn’t go with his “more robust” tariff plan initially. The answer is obvious, and cold water in the face of those who saw this ruling as a big win for democracy: Trump needed the Supreme Court to vote against him in order to demonstrate that it didn’t matter.

EightyGee (Athomas Goldberg) reposted

There should be nationwide marches against all the gigantic concentration camps.

I hope that the Democrats are finally realizing that Trump’s followers don’t support him because he’s espoused policies (no foreign intervention, etc.) that they believe in, they have those beliefs because they support him, so calling out the Trump’s hypocrisy isn’t going to change anyone’s mind.

Their support is based on their fear and their perceived need for a strongman in a time of global uncertainty where they feel their very identities are threatened, and are willing to defer to their leader, without question, so long as he promises to keep them safe.

Just putting this out here now for future reference: Elections will not fix the current American nightmare. An administration that controls all levers of judicial enforcement and a willingness to disregard the rule of law isn’t going to let “electoral niceties” stand in the way of its objectives.

Let’s say by some miracle the American ultimately remove Trump from office. Now that the full destructive power of the Presidency has been revealed, how do we ever let anyone have that kind of power again? And how do we prevent it without completely re-architecting the federal government?

View full thread

Ironically, this doesn’t include candidates whose only platform is “loyalty to Trump” as that only makes them members of another “Establishment” You don’t have to be the leader, but you can’t really be anti-establishment while basing all your views on someone else’s.

It also what fuelled Trump’s return to power. The divide isn’t between left & right and hasn’t been for awhile. - it’s between pro- and anti-establishment. It’s time for the dems to stop racing to the right in a futile attempt to reach an imaginary “more conservative” America.

Trump didn’t get re-elected because he was more “conservative” or “centrist” than Harris. And he didn’t get elected because Harris was too “woke”. He got elected because he represented a big middle finger to a government Americans have come to angrily view as broken and useless…

From the NY Times - "It has all created a strange dynamic on Capitol Hill: Mr. Johnson appears to be using the considerable power of the speakership to render the House irrelevant." It's not strange if it's the plan. I think there is a > 0% chance that the US Federal Government never reopens.

EightyGee (Athomas Goldberg) reposted

How could I hope to stand upon the pedestal I've put you on? My piece for the Down Limbo Lane collab! Which is super cool and totally worth checking out the talent is INSANE #greatgodgrove #fanart

This should be a warning to EVERY law firm, university or country that thinks they can “negotiate” with Trump by capitulating to his demands. Any time he thinks he’s found an “opponent” who’s weak (and everyone who negotiates is an opponent) he’ll continue to subjugate until there’s nothing left.

nytimes.comLaw Firms Made Deals With Trump. Now He Wants More From Them.To avoid retribution, big firms agreed to provide free legal services for uncontroversial causes. To the White House, that could mean negotiating trade deals — or even defending the president and his ...

Oh FFS… It’s not that hard, folks. Any country with a trade surplus with the US gets tariffs above 10% until they buy more stuff from US than they sell to US. Once they do, they get 10% tariff forever. That’s it. The whole plan. It’s not a mystery. There’s nothing to guess at. Sheesh.

apnews.comWhite House keeps world guessing as clock ticks down to Trump's new tariffsThe White House is sending mixed messages on tariffs as it pursues conflicting goals, frustrating foreign leaders and business executives who are desperate for clarity on a generational overhaul of in...

Or put even simpler - Trump wants other countries to buy more stuff. The problem is, of course, that “countries” don’t really buy things, their people and companies do, which the governments don’t directly control, which is why they’re confused about what they’re supposed to offer in negotiations.

This is it, right here: “Let’s take Vietnam. When they come to us and say ‘We’ll go to zero tariffs,’ that means nothing to us because it’s the nontariff cheating that matters,” Navarro told CNBC’s “Squawk Box.” “They sell us $15 for every $1 we sell them.” 1/🧵

View full thread

This isn't an intelligent or rational view of trade - countries, especially poor countries like Vietnam (and Lesotho!), can't force their citizens buy more American products, so the only other option is to reduce imports to the US through tariffs. 3/🧵

What Canada, the EU, and China, already recognize, and the rest of the world will soon learn is this: no tariff concession, or "negotiation" is going to change Trump's mind or policy on tariffs because they're the only way, in his mind, that he can possibly "win" the trade war. 4/🧵

This is it, right here: “Let’s take Vietnam. When they come to us and say ‘We’ll go to zero tariffs,’ that means nothing to us because it’s the nontariff cheating that matters,” Navarro told CNBC’s “Squawk Box.” “They sell us $15 for every $1 we sell them.” 1/🧵

Might be the first time in forever that I’ve completely agreed with Musk on something.

Axios@axios.com

NEW: Elon Musk escalated his war of words with Trump trade adviser Peter Navarro, calling him "truly a moron" and "dumber than a sack of bricks" over comments about Musk's businesses