dynomight

dynomight

@dynomight.net

dynomight.net space invasion

752 followers182 following429 posts

Strongly feel that the ultimate destination of this kind of argument is that consciousness does not come in discrete clumps.

Grace@gracekind.net

If you believe that consciousness exists or occurs in a physical location, and that LLMs are conscious, you need to be okay with the idea of that location jumping around / being spread out over large distances

What I'd like is for AI-risk skeptics to commit to publicly acknowledging they were wrong if they turn out to have been wrong, in the way that 90% of the people who supported Iraq War II never did.

hot take but walking around in public with thousands of strangers and ~zero concern anyone will stab you and take your stuff

norvid_studies@norvid-studies.bsky.social

what else is like this

Once found myself thinking: "Once I get these new self-watering pots, my life is going to really come together."

Tyler Alterman@tyleralterman.bsky.social

I’m terrified by my tendency to get swallowed up by my own stories: “This is the right moral philosophy.” “This person will save me.” “This project is what I should dedicate my life to.” 2yrs later: “ugh wtf” What are healthy ways to interact with this tendency?

What I really find surprising is that there's a huge demand for AI writing detectors but (seemingly?) almost no demand for AI image/video detectors. I *definitely* would not have predicted that.

norvid_studies@norvid-studies.bsky.social

I think it's interesting and slightly surprising the degree to which AI image and video generation has been a "nothing happens" effect, compared to what one might have reasonably predicted in advance. now this may be my anecdotal experience firewalled off from "the bad internet",

Thread of ideas that don't have short names but deserve them: 1. For most common issues, if you just research and follow standard boring conventional best-practices, you'll do better than ~95% of people, because they don't do that.

View full thread

4. It's actually quite hard to find generalists who are simultaneously pretty competent and reliable and easy to work with. You get get surprisingly far in the world by just being mildly above-average on all those three axes at the same time.

5. This RCT showing a small but non-significant effect is completely consistent with a true small effect, or no effect.

Thread of ideas that don't have short names but deserve them: 1. For most common issues, if you just research and follow standard boring conventional best-practices, you'll do better than ~95% of people, because they don't do that.

View full thread

3. Sometimes when people say they aren't worried about something but give weird and shifting explanations, that's because they don't actually believe that thing is possible, but haven't fully acknowledged that fact to themselves.

(I stress that these ideas are not necessarily correct, but if nothing else we could shorten debates by having them once and for all and giving them labels.)

Thread of ideas that don't have short names but deserve them: 1. For most common issues, if you just research and follow standard boring conventional best-practices, you'll do better than ~95% of people, because they don't do that.

2. AI is exhausting and many of us are sick to death of thinking about it, but it's so massively consequential (potential AGI, obviously, but even just to the short-term US economy) that not thinking about it is not an option.

On a near-daily basis I get emails offering to pay for "sponsored articles" or for linking to sketchy crypto/casino sites. I guess everyone gets these? Search engines surely prohibit this, but does it get your content removed from LLM training?

Whichever scraper is going through my blogposts, one-by-one requesting 50-100 copies of each at the same time, once per hour, while pretending to be referred from Google and running javascript and not blocking goatcounter: Why are you doing that?

I need blog recommendations, please send blog recommendations. (Do not let modesty prevent you from recommending your own blog.)

The fact that humans have different emotional reactions when witnessing an event versus hearing about it from a credible source is surprisingly central to explaining the state of the world

Counterpoint: Perhaps this is just because we become inured to anything we experience a lot? If witnessing was common and hearing rare, maybe it would be the opposite?

Starting to suspect that the same qualities that would make someone flee twitter also tend to make you hesitant to engage too much with microblogging (or internet life) in general.

visa@visakanv.com

does it feel like bsky still gets new waves of people fleeing X, or does that feel like it’s been done for a while?

A few times I've tried not deleting comments, but banning the commentators for a token amount of time with an explanation. Theoretically that seems good? But in practice they post my ban note on twitter and get their friends to send me hate mail...

dynomight@dynomight.net

Does anyone have a theory of comment moderation? I struggle people seem to be engaging in good faith, but are voicing opinions that are ~crazy. Removing these people feels dictatorial, but if you don't then you get gigantic useless threads of people trying/failing to change their mind.

Does anyone have a theory of comment moderation? I struggle people seem to be engaging in good faith, but are voicing opinions that are ~crazy. Removing these people feels dictatorial, but if you don't then you get gigantic useless threads of people trying/failing to change their mind.

me: i just can't understand why everyone takes themselves so seriously psychologists: that's because you have high neuroticism me: aha

hacker news has once again detected my secret plan to profit by writing about aspartame on my non-monetized pseudonymous blog