Duncan Weldon

Duncan Weldon

@duncanweldon.bsky.social

Economics writer. Author. Expect history, economics, finance and other stuff. Some cricket. Wrote Two Hundred Years of Muddling Through. Blood and Treasure, on the economics of war, out now.

26.5K followers1.6K following9.8K posts

A useful thing that the OBR might do but which the government probably can’t: a nice long section clarifying the costs of the Iran war on the British economy and public finances.

Theory: A chancellor being an economist can be actively unhelpful. There’s a tendency to worry too much about other economists think. So you end up leaving obvious political wins on the table because someone who you respect might say something mean about you at a Peterson Institute roundtable.

This is not only good policy but also a sign of how much progress Burnham & Healey have made on getting markets on side. www.ft.com/content/4111... John Healey to give £20bn boost to UK’s business lender and infrastructure bank

ft.comJohn Healey to give £20bn boost to UK’s business lender and infrastructure bankTreasury predicts extra funding will create and support 100,000 jobs as chancellor seeks to exploit flexibility in government’s fiscal rules

I think it can be quite hard to grasp - unless you have seen it first hand - quite how much of the work of a junior economist at a central bank, etc is just gathering this sort of data and making these sorts of charts.

I’m lucky enough to have a good high street about 10/12 minutes walk away. Quick look through the last month of bank transactions for retail spending there: Holland & Barrett (once), TG Jones (three times), indie vape shop (twice), indie card & overpriced tat present shop (once).

James Ball@jamesrball.com

The British syndrome, summarised: 78% of us say our high streets are important to us. But only 28% of us actually use their local high street even once a week – and only 53% of people said they used theirs *once a month*. We won't use it, and we won't lose it.

For a user, yes the message ‘is your coworker getting praise? Use this tool to copy his work’ might work. But for an actual business decision maker making material calls about how much AI to use and how much to spend - surely this is off putting?

Told my family I’d like to watch Pakistan England today and that it starts at 8am. They all seem to have assumed it’s a T20 game and will be done before noon. Oh well. Not my fault if they don’t grasp the difference between 20 over and 50 over cricket.

Politics! A Prime Minister making an argument. Trying to persuade people of something. Again.

Matthew Holehouse@matthewholehouse.bsky.social

A possible Zeitenwende from Burnham to Ben Riley-Smith: open to freedom of movement, no to the euro or Schengen

Reminder: if Sooryavanshi was in the UK, he’d have just finished his first half term in Year 11.

Cricinfo@cricinfo.com

Vaibhav Sooryavanshi is set to bat at No. 3 in the second NZ-IND T20I, where India have opted to bowl. Sooryavanshi replaces the injured Ishan Kishan and Prince Yadav comes in for Mayank Yadav; for New Zealand, Jacob Duffy replaces Adam Milne srkl.in/63321BC5795

Economic types with long memories: I’m trying to find a paper (or Fed policymaker speech?) which I have memories of reading in the mid-2010s and which argued that 2007-2009 should be seen as an energy price shock (price shock - recession - losses - financial crisis, being the sequence). Any ideas?

The awful consumer confidence figures do suggest - to look at the silver lining for a moment - that consumers will respond to an energy price shock by cutting back. That suggests more contained second round impacts on inflation and is ammo for the MPC doves.

I’d go slightly further and say it’s debt service/tax receipts that is the really crucial measure to watch.

Toby Nangle@tobyn.bsky.social

Absent a failed auction/ proper panic, France’s debt service costs rise only slowly. Bond mkt pressure is chronic rather than acute, so competes with other chronic pressures (and likely trumped by those that become acute first).

In fact, I reckon one of the best ways to understand the British party system breakdown and realignment in the 1920s is through the lens of really high debt service costs. The political economy of taxing people more *and* paying more of that revenue to debt service is toxic.