Dr Ryan MacDonald

Dr Ryan MacDonald

@distantworlds.space

Lecturer in Extrasolar Planets 🪐 🔭 at the University of St Andrews 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

2K followers532 following565 posts

Pinned

I'm excited to announce that I will be joining the University of St Andrews as a Lecturer in Extrasolar Planets in June 2025! 🌟 🪐 🔭 🌍 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 If you're interested in pursuing a PhD, postdoc, or fellowship in exoplanet atmospheres in beautiful Scotland (from Autumn 2025), please feel free to get in touch.

Dr Ryan MacDonald reposted

"There are shades of the departed Starmer government in this saga: @ukri.org wants to tell a big story about science funding going up, but instead is mired in a row over a fairly minor sum.... One does not have to be an astronomer to know that optics matter." 👌🔭 www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...

theguardian.comThe Guardian view on the Lovell telescope: budget cuts to physics are bad science and worse politics | EditorialEditorial: Funders have picked a damaging fight with scientists and the public. They should reconsider their plans

Dr Ryan MacDonald reposted

Can a planet survive the death of its star? ☠️ For WD 1856 b, the answer is yes, based on Webb observations. 🔭 🧪 ☄️ 1/2

🚨 New research alert 🚨 We have found an atmosphere on a planet orbiting a dead star 🔭✴️💀🪐 Our James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) observations of the white dwarf planet WD 1856b give us a preview into the fate of planets like Jupiter after the death of the Sun. 🧵⬇️ (1/10)

View full thread

🚨 New research alert 🚨 We have found an atmosphere on a planet orbiting a dead star 🔭✴️💀🪐 Our James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) observations of the white dwarf planet WD 1856b give us a preview into the fate of planets like Jupiter after the death of the Sun. 🧵⬇️ (1/10)

View full thread

Perhaps our biggest surprise though is that the planet appears to be significantly warmer than we expected (effective temprature around 400 K). Using planet cooling models, we extrapolated back in time to find that planet must have been reheated billions of years after the star died.

So our best explanation for how WD 1856b survived stellar death is that it was originally on a wide orbit, but gradually moved in closer due to the influence of two nearby M-dwarf stars (about 1,000 AU from the white dwarf). Close passes by with the white dwarf led to tidal heating and migration.

🚨 New research alert 🚨 We have found an atmosphere on a planet orbiting a dead star 🔭✴️💀🪐 Our James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) observations of the white dwarf planet WD 1856b give us a preview into the fate of planets like Jupiter after the death of the Sun. 🧵⬇️ (1/10)

View full thread

The transit spectrum we measure shows multiple 'bumps' that are best explained by methane (CH4) in the planet's atmosphere, alongside a slope at short wavelengths caused by a haze in the upper atmosphere. This is the first time we've seen the atmosphere of a close-in planet orbiting a white dwarf!

Our spectrum analysis finds that hydrocarbons (most likely methane) explains the absorption features (with an odds ratio of at least 167:1). The planet's atmosphere is also shrouded in aerosols (odds ratio at least 200,000:1). We also find the mass of the planet is about 7 Jupiter masses.

🚨 New research alert 🚨 We have found an atmosphere on a planet orbiting a dead star 🔭✴️💀🪐 Our James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) observations of the white dwarf planet WD 1856b give us a preview into the fate of planets like Jupiter after the death of the Sun. 🧵⬇️ (1/10)

View full thread

We used the NASA/ESA/CSA James Webb Space Telescope to measure the spectrum of WD 1856b during a transit event. Our goal was to measure the atmosphere of this ancient planet (that formed around 10 billion years ago) to learn what planets like Jupiter may be like after the death of the Sun.

This planet is 7 times larger than its white dwarf star, so it blocks a record-breaking over 50% of the light from its white dwarf. One of our big surprises is that the planet appears to block *less* light at longer wavelength infrared light, which we explained by planetary thermal emission.

🚨 New research alert 🚨 We have found an atmosphere on a planet orbiting a dead star 🔭✴️💀🪐 Our James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) observations of the white dwarf planet WD 1856b give us a preview into the fate of planets like Jupiter after the death of the Sun. 🧵⬇️ (1/10)

WD 1856b orbits a very old white dwarf, the leftover core of a star like our own Sun that died about 5.4 billion years ago. It was discovered in 2020 (Vanderburg+2020). The planet is a similar size to Jupiter, but orbits at 0.02 AU. A big mystery is how the planet survived the death of its star.

Kicking off #BPSC26 with a workshop on exoplanet atmosphere spectroscopy for planetary scientists. Be sure to follow @bpsc2026.bsky.social for updates over this 3 day conference! 🪐 🔭

Dr Ryan MacDonald reposted

These are awesome positions where you'll play critical roles in STScI's missions (HST, JWST, Roman)! Definitely apply if interested! Feel free to reach out if you've any questions.

Brett Morris@brettmorr.is

Graduating with a bachelors or masters in astronomy (or related field)? Want to keep your eyes on the skies without a PhD? Opening for YOU at @stsci.edu: Science Support Analyst on Hubble 🔭 recruiting2.ultipro.com/SPA1004AURA/...

Dr Ryan MacDonald reposted

Dr Ryan MacDonald reposted

Calling all planetary scientists: The #BPSC26 abstract and early-bird registration deadline of May 9th is soon approaching! Email us your abstracts following the instructions at tinyurl.com/4x8tm6bu, and register for the conference at tinyurl.com/yvnxf6jw. Come share your science with us in June!

tinyurl.comAbstracts and Presenter Details – BPSC2026You must be registered to have your contribution (oral/poster) included in the conference.

Dr Ryan MacDonald reposted

✨ Applications for the 2026 International Astronomical Youth Camp are now open! ✨🚀 Join us in Spain for the 60th lAYC celebration and experience an unforgettable total solar eclipse! 🌘 Head to our First Info page via the link in our bio to apply! Clear skies 🌌 🔭🎢 #EduSky #scicomm #astroedu

🚨 Job vacancy! We are recruiting a Computing Officer for the School of Physics and Astronomy at St Andrews ⚛️🔭 High-Performance Computing is critical to our work on understanding the Universe, including the search for life on other planets. 🪐🧑‍💻🖥️ www.vacancies.st-andrews.ac.uk/Vacancies/W/...

vacancies.st-andrews.ac.ukComputing Officer (Academic Computing) - AD2860Computing Officer (Academic Computing) - AD2860, IT Services Salary: Grade 6 / £38,784-£46,049pa Start date: 1 June 2026 Full time Permanent, <p style="color: #212529; margin: 0px 0px 1rem; padding: 0...

Dr Ryan MacDonald reposted

We have written to Science Minister Lord Patrick Vallance urging him to step him and help reverse the cuts to astronomy and space science proposed by the Science and Technology Facilities Council last month. Read the letter in full 👉️ ras.ac.uk/news-and-pre...

ras.ac.uk'Reverse the cuts': RAS urges Vallance to avert scientific crisisThe Royal Astronomical Society (RAS) has called on science minister Patrick Vallance to step in and prevent the "catastrophic damage to astronomy and space science" ...

We're excited to be hosting the British Planetary Society Conference in St Andrews this summer! One of our aims for BPSC 2026 is to connect the Solar System #planetaryscience and #Exoplanets communities. Be sure to follow the conference page for more details: ⬇️🪐🌍🧪⬇️

Our website for the British Planetary Society Conference 2026 is now live! 📅 9-11 June, 2026 🎯 St Andrews, Scotland 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Our website contains details on how to get to St Andrews and the conference accommodation. Registration details will be added soon. bpsc2026.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk

The Norman Lockyer Fellowship is a great opportunity for postdoc research in #Exoplanets, and we'd love to host you at St Andrews! Feel free to reach out if you're interested in joining our exoplanet group in beautiful Scotland 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🪐

Royal Astronomical Society@royalastrosoc.bsky.social

🧑‍🔬 Need funding to support your research?🧑‍🔬 We're now accepting applications for the Norman Lockyer Fellowship, offered to outstanding candidates to enable them to pursue research in the UK in the disciplines advanced by the Royal Astronomical Society. 🔭🪐 ⤵️

View full thread

We have follow-up observations of TRAPPIST-1e ongoing (led by Néstor Espinoza and Natalie Allen), which will provide 15 (!) more transits of TRAPPIST-1e. So if TRAPPIST-1e does indeed have an atmosphere, we will soon have the data to settle the enigma of this world.

Finally, it's important to highlight that none of this would have been possible without the leadership of Nikole Lewis, who is the PI of this initial TRAPPIST-1e reconnaissance program. I was fortunate enough to be a postdoc at Cornell with Nikole, and she is a truly *fantastic* advisor and mentor!

View full thread

Technical point: retrievals of flat transmission spectra for rocky planets usually result in corner plots resembling the prior. For TRAPPIST-1e, we don't see this behaviour, with the CH4 posterior pushing to include this molecule. We haven't detected CH4, but future observations can assess this.

View full thread

Intriguingly, forward models with N2 + CH4 provided a great fit to TRAPPIST-1e's transmission spectrum 😯 We found the same solution independently through atmospheric retrievals, which latched onto CH4 absorption as a potential explanation. 🔍 But this is not (yet!) an atmospheric detection.

Statistically, our current four-transit spectrum of TRAPPIST-1e can also be fit by a flat line (i.e. a featureless spectrum). So we can't rule out a bare rock with these data. There's also the important caveat that an incomplete stellar contamination correction could also imprint spectral features.

View full thread

In Paper #2, we ran a grid of atmospheric models considering combinations of strong infrared absorbers (CO2 / CH4) and transparent background gases (N2 / H2). The figure below (from Glidden+2025) shows the range of excluded partial pressures. Big takeaway: large CO2 concentrations are unlikely.

View full thread

Using GPs to account for the stellar contamination, we combined the time-independent spectral information from the four transits to produce the spectrum of TRAPPIST-1e shown in the press release. We then turned to atmospheric models to see if there were any signatures of atmospheric absorption.

Our first result was a firm rejection of any significant amount of hydrogen in TRAPPIST-1e's atmosphere. Irrespective of the cloud-surface pressure, we find a H2 abundance limit of < 80% (to 3σ). This is a significant improvement over what was possible with Hubble data.

View full thread

When we modelled the stellar contamination (similar to previous studies on TRAPPIST-1b,c, d), the models couldn't simultaneously explain the entire wavelength range. Simply put, our stellar models for ultra-cool M-dwarf stars like TRAPPIST-1 don't work 😱 So we had to try something new...

We turned to Gaussian Processes (GPs) to fit the stellar contamination affecting the TRAPPIST-1e spectra. Since: Observed_spectrum_i = contamination_i * planet_spectrum The idea is to extract the time-independent (non-GP) common factor caused by any planetary atmosphere.

View full thread

TRAPPIST-1e is 92% Earth's size, 69% Earth's mass, and is illuminated by 66% of the integrated light that Earth receives. This means TRAPPIST-1e can potentially have liquid surface water *if* it has an atmosphere with a sufficient greenhouse effect. So TRAPPIST-1e was a priority target for JWST.

We observed TRAPPIST-1e four times with JWST in 2023 to measure how the apparent size of the planet changes with colour (i.e. transmission spectra) - more on why this took 2 years in a moment! Our spectra show *huge* wavelength-dependent features that are caused by active regions on the star ✴️

Previously, on TRAPPIST-1: ➡️ No thick atmospheres on TRAPPIST-1b,c (Greene+2023, Lim+2023, Zieba+2023, Radica+2025, Gillon+2025). ➡️ Earth-like atmospheres ruled out for TRAPPIST-1d (Piaulet-Ghorayeb+2025) - see thread below. Now we turn to a planet more firmly in the habitable zone: TRAPPIST-1e.

Dr Ryan MacDonald@distantworlds.space

We looked for an atmosphere on TRAPPIST-1d using JWST, but we didn't see any atmospheric absorption. So TRAPPIST-1d is quite different from Earth, despite lying just inside the habitable zone. The planet is either: ➡️ A bare rock. ➡️ Very cloudy. ➡️ Has a thin, Mars-like atmosphere. #Exoplanets 🔭

We looked for an atmosphere on TRAPPIST-1d using JWST, but we didn't see any atmospheric absorption. So TRAPPIST-1d is quite different from Earth, despite lying just inside the habitable zone. The planet is either: ➡️ A bare rock. ➡️ Very cloudy. ➡️ Has a thin, Mars-like atmosphere. #Exoplanets 🔭

ESA Space Science@science.esa.int

The TRAPPIST-1 d exoplanet may be Earth-sized 🌍 but it has no Earth-like atmosphere. Webb’s #NIRSpec has found no traces of molecules that are common in Earth’s atmosphere. Read more 👉 www.esa.int/Science_Expl... 🔭 🧪

View full thread

The JWST observations should have seen gases like CO2, H2O, or CH4 for relatively clear thick atmospheres. So the non-detections rule out many classes of rocky planet atmospheres, including: 🌍 Modern and Archean (early) Earth. ♀️ Venus (unless very cloudy). 🔱 Titan.

We looked for an atmosphere on TRAPPIST-1d using JWST, but we didn't see any atmospheric absorption. So TRAPPIST-1d is quite different from Earth, despite lying just inside the habitable zone. The planet is either: ➡️ A bare rock. ➡️ Very cloudy. ➡️ Has a thin, Mars-like atmosphere. #Exoplanets 🔭

ESA Space Science@science.esa.int

The TRAPPIST-1 d exoplanet may be Earth-sized 🌍 but it has no Earth-like atmosphere. Webb’s #NIRSpec has found no traces of molecules that are common in Earth’s atmosphere. Read more 👉 www.esa.int/Science_Expl... 🔭 🧪