Christopher Dodge

Christopher Dodge

@cdodge33.bsky.social

Doctoral Researcher | Literacy Equity & Systems Redesign | Educator Preparation | Former Principal | Writer of Breaking the Blueprint

228 followers614 following76 posts

If a teacher cannot implement an accommodation without additional support, whose responsibility is it to provide that support — and how did we design a system where that question has no clear answer?

New research reviewed 10 years of Science of Reading scholarship. The structural dimensions of equity — race, redistribution, justice — were nearly absent. The communities most affected by SoR mandates were the least studied. What does that choice produce in your building?

Educational reforms gain political traction when they serve the interests of dominant groups while only appearing to benefit marginalized communities (Bell, 1980). The Science of Reading movement gained momentum from advocacy by predominantly White, middle-class parents of children with dyslexia.

We continue to confuse professional ethic with a structural dependency the system cannot survive without. When the formal shell of compliance is automated, what remains of the student experience?

If preparation programs built in one course that taught new teachers to analyze the systems they were entering (the incentive structures, the data flows, the meeting designs), what would those graduates do differently in year one? And would the schools they entered know what to do with them?

Reteaching isn’t in the pacing guide. Neither is understanding. The data comes back exactly how you knew it would. You bring it to the meeting. The pacing guide kept moving. The pacing guide was built to move content, not move kids. When those two things conflict, the guide wins. Every time.

Somewhere between the law and the logistics, the belief of inclusivity became the structure, now replicating the same inequities it intended to dissolve. What would make your school more accepting and accommodating of diverse learner needs?

When a student fails an assignment in your school, does the system help you tell the difference between a content deficit and a format mismatch — or does the rubric treat them the same?

Rigor is what the student must know and be able to do. Uniformity is how the system has chosen to measure it. They look the same from the outside. They cost different kids entirely.

You already know this isn’t working. You just haven’t said it out loud yet. When dysregulated adults are asked to regulate dysregulated kids, the system hasn’t solved anything. It’s just redistributed the problem. The loop keeps running. The budget keeps getting approved. Nothing changes.

You manage what can be documented. That’s your leadership. We don’t evaluate whether lessons work. We evaluate whether they can be defended. People get better at documentation, and call it improvement. That’s the system working exactly as designed. It’s performance theater.

We don’t have a teacher shortage. We have a training model that produces exits. We already know what works. We just haven’t designed for it. Because the system isn’t optimized for developing teachers. It’s optimized for staffing classrooms. That tradeoff is the part we avoid naming.

Thinking in silos is a hallmark of American education. It is the educator who creates the learning experience, and it is the student who makes meaning from it. Transactional. Individualistic. Capitalist. Input. Output. Outward thinking is humanitarian.