CarbonPlan

CarbonPlan

@carbonplan.org

We help climate solutions live up to their potential through transparency, accountability, and scientific integrity. www.carbonplan.org

4.7K followers1 following151 posts

Analyzing the impacts of stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) requires climate data at finer spatial resolution than global models provide. We’re releasing an open-source, downscaled SAI dataset to support SAI impacts research and to expose uncertainties associated with downscaling itself.

carbonplan.orgData to evaluate the regional impacts of stratospheric aerosol injection – CarbonPlanReleasing downscaled versions of stratospheric aerosol injection simulations, alongside tools to make it accessible.
View full thread

We hope this enables researchers across the globe to explore the regional impacts that matter to them, provides a benchmark for independent downscaling efforts, and lays the foundation for more systematic research into how downscaling itself introduces uncertainty into understanding of SAI impacts.

Analyzing the impacts of stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) requires climate data at finer spatial resolution than global models provide. We’re releasing an open-source, downscaled SAI dataset to support SAI impacts research and to expose uncertainties associated with downscaling itself.

carbonplan.orgData to evaluate the regional impacts of stratospheric aerosol injection – CarbonPlanReleasing downscaled versions of stratospheric aerosol injection simulations, alongside tools to make it accessible.
View full thread

Analyzing the impacts of stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) requires climate data at finer spatial resolution than global models provide. We’re releasing an open-source, downscaled SAI dataset to support SAI impacts research and to expose uncertainties associated with downscaling itself.

carbonplan.orgData to evaluate the regional impacts of stratospheric aerosol injection – CarbonPlanReleasing downscaled versions of stratospheric aerosol injection simulations, alongside tools to make it accessible.
View full thread

As interest in SAI grows so does the urgency for research supporting public scrutiny and informed decision-making. We need to understand the disparate ways SAI could affect people, plants, animals, and ecosystems. That analysis requires climate data at a finer spatial resolution than GCMs provide.

That’s where downscaling comes in. Downscaling translates coarse-resolution climate model output into a finer-resolution form that can be used by impact modelers. But it’s not a straightforward process. There are many ways to downscale data, and small methodological choices can change your results.

Analyzing the impacts of stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) requires climate data at finer spatial resolution than global models provide. We’re releasing an open-source, downscaled SAI dataset to support SAI impacts research and to expose uncertainties associated with downscaling itself.

carbonplan.orgData to evaluate the regional impacts of stratospheric aerosol injection – CarbonPlanReleasing downscaled versions of stratospheric aerosol injection simulations, alongside tools to make it accessible.

Recently, there’s been a marked uptick in activity around solar radiation modification — a family of approaches that aims to reduce global warming by reflecting sunlight back into space. Much of that activity, including growing private investment, centers on one method in particular, SAI.

View full thread

Our takeaway: if you need conservative carbon removal estimates or an accurate picture of alkalinity loss pathways, the time resolution of the meteorological forcings likely matters, and it’s worth testing the sensitivity in your model setup before landing one way or the other.

There’s more work to do here. Our work points toward three follow-up research questions that we think would help provide more confident guidance on picking the right time resolution for meteorological forcing.

View full thread

Across eight example sites, coarser meteorological forcing made soils wetter and more CO₂-rich, even though total water supply and demand didn’t change. That boosted rock weathering, but only by 10-20 percent.

More interestingly, changes in rock weathering didn’t map neatly onto changes in carbon removal. Some sites saw a small bump in weathering and a bigger bump in carbon removal. Others got similar removal estimates for different reasons — like more weathering canceled out by more alkalinity loss.

We thought this decision could be consequential. Many processes that control enhanced weathering respond non-linearly to weather extremes, and coarse meteorological data average them out.

In our model setup, this didn’t end up spelling the difference between estimating a lot of carbon removal and none at all. But the effects warrant attention because they are geochemically complex, and they hinge on the structure of the model itself.

We’re hiring a Research Associate to expand our work on climate risk. If you’re passionate about ensuring public access to high-quality climate risk data, and informing just and scientifically-grounded adaptation policy, please apply.

apply.workable.comResearch Associate - CarbonPlanCarbonPlan is a nonprofit organization using science and data to accelerate climate action. Our team analyzes the design and implementation of climate programs across the public and private sector, an...

Update: Applications for the Research Associate role will close on Tuesday, August 25. Please apply before then for consideration. While we typically keep our roles open until filled, we’ve already received more than 600 applications for this position, and have limited capacity for review.

If you’ve already applied, thank you! All applications will receive a reply. Given the small size of our team & the fact that we consider every application, this may take time. We respectfully request that you not contact us to inquire about your app status or about applying after the close date.

We also show that preprinting is starting to take off in carbon removal, but widespread adoption still requires a cultural shift. If you’re a carbon removal researcher, preprinting your work can keep that momentum going, and help boost coordination in a field that acutely needs it.

This mistake is a reminder that we still have a lot to learn about simulating enhanced weathering. We’re still in the learning phase, and mistakes are inevitable. For now, while methods and norms are rapidly developing, model results should be understood as provisional.

View full thread

The harder problem was knowing which regions actually completed. Zarr has no built-in way to track this, and Spot Instances can be terminated at any time.

We used @earthmover.io's Icechunk, which brings git-like versioning to Zarr. Each VM records its completion as a commit, so the dataset’s own history becomes the record of what’s done. If some region fails, just rerun the pipeline: only the missing regions get reprocessed.

We knew that working at this scale with Xarray and Dask would bring well-known challenges. In response, we reached for newer tools in the Pangeo ecosystem and took an unconventional approach to writing Zarr stores.

To start, we broke the dataset into spatial regions and processed each one independently on cheap, cloud VMs (Spot Instances), which kept things manageable and made it easy to scale.

View full thread

When you account for that financial benefit, we find nearly a third of associated offset credits are non-additional (5.95M of 19.2M) — the reductions would have happened anyway, even without selling carbon offsets.

Lithos’s first enhanced weathering credits claim a surprisingly high amount of gross carbon removal that we think deserves scrutiny. We tried to figure out what could make these high numbers possible, but we were limited by the available data and left with more questions than answers.

carbonplan.orgQuestions about Lithos’ first ERW credit issuance – CarbonPlanWe were surprised by the high removal rates claimed in a recent credit issuance to the ERW company Lithos. This post explains what questions the issuance raised for us, and what needs to change to get...

If this carbon removal outcome is real, we need public evidence to understand why. If it’s not, then this is a case of over-issuance that should be corrected. Either way, there’s a lesson here that’s impossible to learn with the relevant data behind closed doors.

We developed two new tools for mapping Zarr data: zarr-layer renders a wide range of datasets with little or no modification. And topozarr adds multiscale overviews and web-friendly chunking to datasets while maintaining projection and resolution. carbonplan.org/blog/zarr-la...

CarbonPlan reposted

Institutions submitting to CDRXIV can build up a substantial body of work over time — but there hasn’t been an easy way to share that work as a collection. Channels fix that, making an institution’s submissions viewable in one place. We’re launching this new feature with three founding channels.

NCAR is the backbone of Earth system science in the US and a global leader in open climate research. It directly supports our mission. Alongside a wide range of peers in the scientific research community, we submitted a letter to NSF strongly opposing any efforts to dismantle or restructure NCAR.

files.carbonplan.orgfiles.carbonplan.org

Advocates of public funding for carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies promise that it will unlock the ability to reduce global temperatures. But that promise will only hold if CDR policymaking aligns with a coherent vision of a net-negative future.

Taking the goal of net negativity seriously has surprising implications for CDR policy design. It can help resolve sticky questions that have occupied the CDR space for years, including which activities to finance, how to deal with their unique characteristics, and how to choose accounting rules.