Mel Andrews

Mel Andrews

@bayesianboy.bsky.social

I’m not like the other Bayesians. I’m different. Thinks about philosophy of science, AI ethics, machine learning, models, & metascience. postdoc @ Princeton.

13.1K followers5.7K following1.2K posts

Pinned

Mel Andrews reposted

Replying to @mitpress.bsky.social

"In Referees We Trust?" is @mbaldwin.bsky.social's investigation into the origins of the peer review system, a system that is often considered the essential mechanism that protects the trustworthiness of scientific research. Available #OpenAccess: mitpress.mit.edu/978026205474...

Mel Andrews reposted

Nihar Shah did a heroic experiment for TMLR: he spent 20-25 hours over two weeks interviewing authors of seemingly low-quality submissions about their own papers. He confirmed what we all suspected: people submitting these papers have *no idea* what is going on in them.

TMLR has faced a deluge of submissions, necessitating stricter desk rejection policies due to limited reviewer capacity Co-EiC Nihar Shah reached out to authors of 10 papers slated for desk reject. Could they answer questions about their *own* submission? medium.com/@TmlrOrg/ask...

Mel Andrews reposted

There are no responsible uses of AI in evaluating research funding applications. Just calling it ‘responsible’ doesn’t make it so. #EthicsWashing #GenAI

They must demarcate the responsible uses of AI in evaluation, with research funding and research performing organisations jointly leading actions in the interest of the research sector and research communities.

When you apply to academic posts in Germany you have to attest to which rigorously specified social categories you belong to under German law and these happen to be (purely coincidentally) the worst names German rappers will call one another on diss tracks.

Mel Andrews reposted

We’re hiring for two positions! One is TT in Ancient, the other an open-rank TT position in mind, science, or ethics. Please share widely! See more on PhilJobs: TT Ancient: philjobs.org/job/show/32273 Open-rank Mind, Science, or Ethics: philjobs.org/job/show/32265

philjobs.org Assistant Professor, University of Cincinnati - PhilJobs:JFP Assistant Professor, University of Cincinnati An international database of jobs for philosophers

Mel Andrews reposted

Hill I'm ready to die on: whether for grants or articles, review by AI is not *peer review*. Review based on a 1st scan by AI without actual reading of the grant or manuscript is not peer review either.

This post is unavailable.

The use of major open problems in mathematics as AI benchmarks mistakes the nature and aims of mathematics: “solving problems is only a tool and proxy for achieving the primary goal of conceptual understanding and insight.”

Terence Tao@teorth.bsky.social

A group of 25 Fields Medalists, including myself, have made a joint declaration on Math and AI: mathandai.org . We welcome additional signatories. See also this article in the Economist announcing the declaration: www.economist.com/science-and-...

You can now read this invaluable book on methods in philosophy of science open-access. Find me in Chapter 16!

Adrian Currie@adrian-currie.bsky.social

Methods in the Philosophy of Science: A User's Guide, edited by the inestimable @phieveigl.bsky.social (and me!), has 27 chapters from super-cool philosophers of science explaining how they do their thing, and is now open access! Our baby is free! #philsci direct.mit.edu/books/oa-edi...

Mel Andrews reposted

Methods in the Philosophy of Science: A User's Guide, edited by the inestimable @phieveigl.bsky.social (and me!), has 27 chapters from super-cool philosophers of science explaining how they do their thing, and is now open access! Our baby is free! #philsci direct.mit.edu/books/oa-edi...

direct.mit.eduMethods in the Philosophy of Science: A User's GuideA guidebook to methods and methodology, encouraging deeper engagement across the philosophy of science and beyond.The last twenty years have seen multiple

Mel Andrews reposted

Very excited that *Methods in the Philosophy of Science: A User's Guide* is now available open access! Lucas and I have a chapter in it on "Doing Public Engagement with Science as a Philosopher of Science" #philsci #scicomm. In our chapter we ...

Adrian Currie@adrian-currie.bsky.social

Methods in the Philosophy of Science: A User's Guide, edited by the inestimable @phieveigl.bsky.social (and me!), has 27 chapters from super-cool philosophers of science explaining how they do their thing, and is now open access! Our baby is free! #philsci direct.mit.edu/books/oa-edi...

Mel Andrews reposted

Expanded these comments into a blog post. These warnings from the A.I. industry are an opportunity, but the opportunity is wasted if we focus only on the solutions they have in mind. The A.I. Industry will never rein itself in davekarpf.beehiiv.com/p/the-a-i-in...

davekarpf.beehiiv.comThe A.I. Industry will never rein itself inOn the latest AI-doom discourse.
Dave Karpf@davekarpf.bsky.social

Three notes: (1) this is not *just* marketing. These guys really do mean it. They are convinced they’ve built a vengeful digital god. (2) but also they’re a cult. They are not impartial scientific experts. (3) and one of the byproduct of their endless confidence is marketing hype.

Mel Andrews reposted

Three notes: (1) this is not *just* marketing. These guys really do mean it. They are convinced they’ve built a vengeful digital god. (2) but also they’re a cult. They are not impartial scientific experts. (3) and one of the byproduct of their endless confidence is marketing hype.

This post is unavailable.

Possibly a significant addendum to the LLM advancements on Navier-Stokes. The problem is not restricted to the model’s potential reproduction of training data, either. A team at OpenAI was prompting their models with the mathematicians’ unpublished work without their knowledge.

Trevor A. Branch@trevorabranch.bsky.social

Millennium math problem solved by OpenAI may have "regurgitated" competitors unpublished work... also they spent more than $22 million in computing power in one week to scoop them. techcrunch.com/2026/09/08/o...

The oldest natural history museum in the nation, the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia, will cease to exist by the end of the month. The museum’s operating costs are half of 1% of Drexel’s budget. Drexel’s president pockets 2.8 million annually. www.nytimes.com/2026/09/01/u...

nytimes.comA Nearly 200-Year-Old Museum Known for Its T. Rex Faces ExtinctionThe Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia, which is affiliated with Drexel University, cited attendance struggles and higher costs in its decision to close.

Who knew that all along the secret of how to teach the kids lay in merely teaching the kids

Girish M. Duvvuri@gmduvvuri.bsky.social

The open secret to pedagogy research is that small class sizes/maximizing educator attention per pupil is the simplest, most effective, and unfortunately the least attractive to administration thing you can do to improve learning outcomes.

Mel Andrews reposted

The open secret to pedagogy research is that small class sizes/maximizing educator attention per pupil is the simplest, most effective, and unfortunately the least attractive to administration thing you can do to improve learning outcomes.

We know how to teach books in the age of AI: small classes, close reading, research-engaged learning (which is how you ’let students see you struggle’). The issue is nobody will hire and pay the requisite # of faculty to offer this.

Mel Andrews reposted

We know how to teach books in the age of AI: small classes, close reading, research-engaged learning (which is how you ’let students see you struggle’). The issue is nobody will hire and pay the requisite # of faculty to offer this.

Mel Andrews reposted

In the 1930s, a group of European philosophers fled fascism and reshaped American philosophy. Why did logical positivism have such an impact on US thought? And why did it play a central role in the culture wars of the 1950s and 1960s? Released today! Logical Positivism: An American History (1/3)

Adolfo Neto@adolfoneto.elixiremfoco.com

"How accurate have (person X)'s predictions been?" I DON'T CARE. I hate predictions, from anyone. I ignore them. In some cases, I hear them as a wish, which I usually share. Please, don't make predictions.

I, too, have been experiencing a sense of alienation from my discipline. Not because I don’t believe that philosophy strives for truth and objectivity, but because believing that the sort of pseudo-reasoning LLMs engage in can achieve these epistemic goods requires having a bad epistemology.

At times I feel that the issue is more that the reactionary right often adequately diagnoses the failures of neoliberalism and then proffers a more extremified neoliberalism as antidote.

Kygosi@kygosi.bsky.social

A venn diagram of what right wingers think is wrong with academia and the real problems facing academia

Spoiler: the reason scientists were hesitant to speak out about issues of scientific soundness and the reason scientific soundness was historically low were not unrelated.

Kate Powers@kate-powers.bsky.social

This is it. I'm so hesitant to speak openly about the major issues with scientific research right now, we need more confidence in science not less right now. BUT my confidence in scientific research is at its lowest ever for very different reasons.