Asier Moneva

Asier Moneva

@asiermoneva.com

Criminologist | Researcher in cybercrime @nscr-instituut.bsky.social & The Hague University of Applied Sciences | Co-Chair @opencriminology.bsky.social πŸ’¬: πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡³πŸ‡± πŸ“: Amsterdam - The Hague

278 followers134 following206 posts

Pinned

Asier Moneva reposted

Metacheck is now hosted by Surf! This offers us the possibility to offer an all in one online solution. Before we advertise this more, we would love to trial the new tool with data managers and editors of Diamond open access journals who want to try out automated checks. Especially of data and code.

Asier Moneva reposted

New preprint! Universities increasingly expect academics to practise open science. But is it rewarded when hiring? We analysed 1,356 academic job ads from Norwegian institutions and found that <5% of ads mentioned open science as a required or desired qualification osf.io/preprints/ps...

Asier Moneva reposted

SocArXiv now has a limit of two papers per week. If authors submit more than that we assume they are LLM-generated and reject them all. Normal humans who need to upload a batch of papers, which sometimes happens, must make arrangements. Also today, ArXiv set a two papers per month limit.

blog.arxiv.orgFair Moderation, Equitable Access, and AI: arXiv’s Updated Rate Limit PolicyarXiv, and the scientific community at large, are facing a watershed moment. Scholarly publishing is currently changing at a rapid pace, and we are seeing a…

Asier Moneva reposted

Asier Moneva reposted

Replying to @opencriminology.bsky.social

The Open Criminology Award for established researchers, sponsored by the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law, goes to Prof Scott Jacques, founder of @crimrxiv.com, for advancing transparent, accessible, and collaborative research practices in criminology. πŸ†

Asier Moneva reposted

Today I’ve given attendees at the #Eurocrim2026 conference a challenge. Be the first to solve this riddle and you’ll get a prize (still to be decided, but probably an Amazon voucher or something): β€˜Who am I? Domestic. Laptop. Bravery’

Last chance to sign up! πŸ‘‡πŸΌ

European Network for Open Criminology@opencriminology.bsky.social

πŸ“’ Interested in collaborative replication, open science, and research methods in criminology? Join us at the inaugural meeting of #CRIMLabs, a new international Many Labs initiative, at @opencriminology.bsky.social pre-conference meeting (9 Sept 2026). Details in the leaflet πŸ‘‡

Two major additions since the previous preprint version: 1️⃣ Instead of discussing two separate types of journeys (human and data), we propose generic "cyber journeys" and introduced the concept of a "journeying entity." Entities can be human (e.g. offenders, victims) or non-human (e.g. data, bots).

2️⃣ We added on what makes journeys unique as an analytical framework. We reflect on the similarities and differences between crime journeys, crime scripts, kill chains, and TTPs. Journeys excel at analyzing individual actions before and during the crime in great detail across space and time.

Asier Moneva reposted

Asier Moneva reposted

Replying to @carlbergstrom.com

13. Hence our dismal conclusion: rather than finding that LLMs free us to do a better job of what we were doing before they came along, they shift scientific incentives (and the playing field of academic competition) in ways that compel us to do more and more, faster and faster, less and less well.

Asier Moneva reposted

1. Weβ€”@eduede.bsky.social, @mjcrockett.bsky.social, Kevin Gross, and Iβ€”have a new preprint on the arXiv today, based on ideas that emerged during an @sfiscience.bsky.social workshop in November 2024: The unintended consequences of large language models as a labor-augmenting technology in science.

arxiv.orgThe unintended consequences of large language models as a labor-augmenting technology in scienceAs a labor-augmenting technology, large language models (LLMs) have the potential to accelerate scientific activity across the research pipeline. But even if LLMs perform on par with human experts at ...

Asier Moneva reposted

After a little break due to busy schedules Nullius in Verba will be back with a new podcast episode later today! We will discuss when and how artificial intelligence and automation can improve the way we do science. Keep an eye on your podcast players!

Asier Moneva reposted

We know a lot about whether investigative interviewing techniques workβ€”but far less about how to implement them, for whom they work, and at what cost. Our new paper shows how the EMMIE framework can help bridge the research–practice gap. doi.org/10.1080/1561... #EvidenceBasedPolicing

doi.orgThe practical relevance of investigative interviewing research: applying the EMMIE framework to bridge the research-practice gapInvestigative interviewing research has produced valuable insights into effective techniques for gathering information. However, this research often fails to fully bridge the gap between academia a...

Asier Moneva reposted

πŸ“’ Nominations are open for the 2026 Open Criminology Award! Recognising outstanding contributions. πŸ†• New for 2026: πŸ† ECR Award (€1,500) πŸ† Established Researcher Award (€2,000)* πŸ“… Deadline: 16 July 2026 πŸ”— esc-enoc.github.io/open-crim-aw... #OpenCriminology #OpenScience *Subject to final agreement.

esc-enoc.github.ioOpen Criminology Award – European Network for Open CriminologyThis document describes the terms of reference of the Open Criminology Awards of the European Network for Open Criminology (ENOC)
View full thread

(While we are a criminology institute, we believe researchers in many other scientific fields will recognize these exact same barriers.) This study serves as an initial assessment to help guide organizational change regarding open science.

View full thread

While most arguments were positive (58% positive, 12% neutral, 30% negative), we wanted to understand why certain practices faced hesitation. Our qualitative analysis identified an average of 4 barriers per practice, totaling 36 unique ones.

A large portion of these barriers involved a lack of supportive culture, incentives, and training. This was followed by concerns over privacy, security, and proprietary rights, as well as challenges within the current format of academic publishing.

View full thread

6️⃣ conducting open peer review 7️⃣ using open-source software 8️⃣ preregistering research 9️⃣ disclosing contribution roles As expected, we found generally positive attitudes. However, colleagues were more cautious about two specific areas: publishing preprints, and conducting open peer review.

Interestingly, the feedback was highly nuanced. On average, our peers are not simply 'for' or 'against' open science as a whole; instead, they support different combinations of these practices.

In our new paper, we conducted a case study at our institute, the NSCR, to analyze our staff's attitudes toward open science. We surveyed our scientific team on 9 different practices: 1️⃣ publishing open access 2️⃣ publishing preprints 3️⃣ sharing open code 4️⃣ sharing open data 5️⃣ sharing open materials

Asier Moneva reposted

Excellent news! Nature is expanding Registered Reports to all the fields in which they publish! A great result by all those proposing this strong solution to publication bias and selective reporting (and getting expert feedback before data collection)! www.nature.com/articles/d41...

Asier Moneva reposted

www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/... Not such a crazy idea after all. Let's do it!

pnas.orgA transparent universal credit system to incentivize peer review | PNASA transparent universal credit system to incentivize peer review
Jose Pina-SΓ‘nchez πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί@jpinasanchez.eurosky.social

Here is an off the top of my head but potentially workable proposal to deal with the peer review crisis and to incentivise quality over quantity: review tokens. You get to submit 1 paper for every 2 you review.

We also found that digital hangouts (e.g. Telegram) are increasingly important. Due to easy access and limited moderation, certain online platforms have become key entry points where youth encounter cybercriminal opportunities. 5/6

Finally, we discuss how we should redefine these offender 'hangouts' in the digital age, and offer some advice to help professionals disrupt youth involvement in financial cybercrime. 6/6

We talked to 25 experts in the field (including police, prosecutors, municipalities, banks, and internet service providers), and analyzed five criminal cases involving various financial cybercrimes (sometimes mixed with traditional crime). 3/6

Contrary to some expectations, offline ties still matter. We found that the offline social environment remains a primary factor for involvement, particularly for core group members and money mules. These relationships foster the trust needed to reduce the perceived risks of co-offending. 4/6

In this new article, led by Joeri Loggen, we examine two such factors among youth involved in financial cybercrime: - their social environment (pre-existing ties) - the places where they hang out (offender convergence settings) We take into account both online and offline contexts. 2/6

You grab a pint, 🍺 we share the science! πŸ’» #PintOfScience May 19, CafΓ© Czaar, Amsterdam. Come for the beer, stay for the crime facts you'll be telling your friends later to sound even cooler! 🎫 Get your tickets here: pintofscience.nl/event/all-ab...

pintofscience.nlAll about crime: crime scenes, courtrooms and cybercrimeWe hear about crime on the news, in movies, or in the latest TV show, but how much of it is actually true? In this event, we will dive deep into the nitty-…