Principal Education Researcher at IACE, Associate Prof at U of Houston, studying how to motivate students in STEM. Academic mama. Bookworm. Every mistake, we must surely be learning. She/her/hers. Views expressed here are my own. Abolish ICE.
🚨New paper alert!🚨 Super proud of the work that went into this one, which includes a systematic review and MEGA-ANALYSIS of the development of sense of belonging in STEM education across Grades K-12, with special attention to gender differences. (1/N)
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
I'm hiring a postdoc to start in summer/fall 2027! My lab uses computational social & cognitive science methods to explore how tech shapes knowledge & power: www.crockettlab.org
You can submit an application here: apply.interfolio.com/195297. Review of apps starts Nov 20. Please share!
Another special issue at Psych Science!
We invite “submissions that advance the field through critical appraisal of articles previously published by Psychological Science”
Please share!
www.psychologicalscience.org/publications...
NEW: In March the White House released an FY27 budget request that zeroed out the National Science Foundation's directorate of Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences (SBE). For months it was unclear what would happen. Now, with FY26 over, the damage to SBE is coming to light.
My reporting:
It's a good idea to apply help-seeking theory (i.e., expedient, instrumental types) to GenAI use. And the facts their profiles replicated past work and relations with help-seeking align with theory both make me more confident in the solution. Next step is to measure actual help-seeking behaviors.
We're hiring research engineers, research associates & several postdocs at the Wisdom & Culture Lab @UWaterloo to build experiments, tools & models on how AI shapes human reasoning, decisions & culture. Psych, cogsci, ML/NLP, HCI & eng backgrounds welcome. uwaterloo.ca/wisdom-and-c...
We are SO back!
🍎 Tuesday Teaching Tip:
Use wise feedback: Communicate the high standard, explain where the work needs improvement, and affirm that the student can meet that standard. Add specific next steps and an opportunity to revise so feedback becomes a pathway forward.
🚨 New paper alert! 🚨 We are excited to share our new SPOE paper, “It doesn’t always have to be this way: Promoting girls’ interest in STEM through growth mindsets and structural explanations of gender differences”! This has two preregistered experimental studies with open materials. (1/9)
🚨 New paper alert! 🚨 We are excited to share our new SPOE paper, “It doesn’t always have to be this way: Promoting girls’ interest in STEM through growth mindsets and structural explanations of gender differences”! This has two preregistered experimental studies with open materials. (1/9)
This gave us the space for a rich discussion of why neither study worked as expected—I think it’s worth a read! Research definitely has a file drawer problem, and I'm so grateful that both of these studies made it out of our file drawers to be shared. (7/9)
There were some interesting exploratory findings: girls who learned about structural explanations were more likely to believe their interest in a new activity could develop over time, and perceived gender differences to be smaller. (8/9)
🚨 New paper alert! 🚨 We are excited to share our new SPOE paper, “It doesn’t always have to be this way: Promoting girls’ interest in STEM through growth mindsets and structural explanations of gender differences”! This has two preregistered experimental studies with open materials. (1/9)
The structural explanation involved learning that gender differences in interest in a novel activity (the "finding game") were because boys had gotten more opportunities to play with it. (5/9)
Neither experiment worked as we expected (despite promising pilot data), but we still found lots of meaningful links between mindsets, beliefs about causes of gender differences, and girls’ interest in STEM. (6/9)
🚨 New paper alert! 🚨 We are excited to share our new SPOE paper, “It doesn’t always have to be this way: Promoting girls’ interest in STEM through growth mindsets and structural explanations of gender differences”! This has two preregistered experimental studies with open materials. (1/9)
Key idea: countering gender stereotypes involves changing girls' perceptions that “STEM is not for me.” Two approaches: counter beliefs that "I can’t change" (with growth mindsets) or counter beliefs that "my group cannot change" (by teaching structural explanations for gender differences) (3/9)
🚨 New paper alert! 🚨 We are excited to share our new SPOE paper, “It doesn’t always have to be this way: Promoting girls’ interest in STEM through growth mindsets and structural explanations of gender differences”! This has two preregistered experimental studies with open materials. (1/9)
👀 Did you miss our panel on Publishing Equity Focused scholarship? No worries. Watch the recording here!: youtu.be/5W5RypEuQp8
Part of our "Doing the Work When It Matters Most" webinar series hosted by APA Division 15's Committee on Social Justice & Equity in Education. 💪
Yale is hiring in developmental psychology (open rank )! We're especially interested in complementing and broadening our area, including via somewhat less traditionally central such as cross-cultural and comparative approaches. Feel free to reach out with questions!
New from me: The University of Houston is proposing cutting 100 courses from its core curriculum to comply with SB 37, but faculty critics say the university's interpreting the law "in ways that go well beyond" what its text says. #HigherEd#AcademicSky
Over the last month I saw that human editors are now stripped of control. I could no longer stop the system from auto-inviting "reviewers" with zero relevant expertise. Even worse - the AI began actively revoking the invitations I manually sent out to actual, qualified experts.
Join NGCP and @allisonmaster.bsky.social for a deep dive into the latest evidence on how #STEM stereotypes are evolving - and where the most critical work remains.
Register here: bit.ly/STEM_Stereotypes
Half of surveyed Texas Tech faculty changed course content on their own after the chancellor's memos restricting teaching on race, gender, and sexuality. More than half say they're now looking for other jobs as a result of the memos. #HigherEd@chronicle.comwww.chronicle.com/article/half...
Join us in welcoming @allisonmaster.bsky.social, PhD, as IACE’s Principal Education Researcher. Stanford-trained in developmental psychology with K–12 STEM motivation expertise, she’ll advance engaging #ComputingEd for all.
Welcome, Dr. Master!
Personal update: I have loved my time at UH, but my family moved to sunny San Diego. This summer, I'll be a Principal Education Researcher with @csedresearch.bsky.social! So excited to do research with @csteachersorg.bsky.social around teacher professional development. Stay tuned!
My latest Substack post, in response to the attempt by Harvard to limit the number of A grades
#HigherEd#Assessment#Gradesopen.substack.com/pub/susandbl...
The APA Division 15 Committee on the Development of Early Career Educational Psychologists (ECEP) is seeking new committee members! We are a fun group that does great work. Join us! Applications due June 14.
purdue.ca1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_...
We just got approved to hire a teaching professor in Quantitative Methods! This is the *very* rare tenure track teaching position at Berkeley. I'll be chairing the search committee. Official job ad coming later this summer!
I'm a big fan of the 2nd edition of The Science of Learning! Clear, practical implications for the classroom based on well-established principles - all presented in a very readable and usable way. Send it to your favorite educator, trainer, or learner today! @deansforimpact #TheScienceOfLearning2
What is a psychological theory? Here's our take on this tricky and controversial question in this week's Experimentology chapter summary.
Many things called "theories" in psychology aren't actually theories — they're frameworks.
🧵 experimentology.io
🚨New publication! This is a very cool one. Based on Suppanut Sriutaisuk's dissertation, we looked at self-perceptions and stereotypes of girls and boys' interest and ability in math using latent profile analyses. @aera-motsig.bsky.social@aeradivc.bsky.socialwww.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Profiles were linked to math GPA, with "for all” and “for me” showing the highest grades. Girls were more prevalent in low motivation profiles. Self-perceptions were more linked to interest stereotypes than ability stereotypes.
I learned so much about the links between stereotypes and motivation through the process of working on this project and looking at these patterns in our data. I love this paper and working with Suppanut! 🥰
The For Others profile was 20% of girls and 16% of boys. This group reported low self-perceptions with high perceptions of both the ingroup’s and outgroup’s attributes, suggesting a belief that others were more competent and interested in math than themselves.
The For Some profile only emerged among boys (25%). This profile showed moderate to somewhat high mean scores for ingroup attributes, outgroup attributes, and self-perceptions, with self-perceptions being comparable or lower than corresponding stereotypes favoring girls’ ability and interest.
For Me was the most common, including 36% of girls and 30% of boys. This one showed high self-perceptions, often higher than both ingroup and outgroup perceptions. Compared to For All, this one had lower perceptions of ingroup and outgroup members, so math was “more for me than for them.”
The For Few profile was least common, particularly among boys (7% boys, 12% girls). Girls and boys in this profile showed relatively low scores on all indicators, suggesting a belief that only a few students possess math competence and interest, and they are not among them.
The profiles showed groups of students whose self-perceptions and stereotypes corresponded to views that math was "for all," "for me," "for some," "for others," or "for few." (Not just high, medium, and low motivation profiles!)
The For All profile included 32% of girls and 22% of boys. This profile generally showed high mean scores across all indicators for both genders, reflecting a belief that everyone was competent and interested in math.
We had two studies involving 2,266 students in Grades 6-12. We looked at demographic predictors of profile membership (separately for girls and boys) and how those profiles predicted math grades.
Junior Co-Chair Nominations Is Open: If you’re interested in running for this position or nominating someone else, please submit your/their information in bit.ly/JuniorCoChai... by May 23. Voting will take place in June. More information is available in the survey link.
An exciting new opportunity at ICPSR for researchers who are interested in conducting educational research using AI with classroom videos.
Application: myumi.ch/8Jzzk
Deadline: June 8, 2026