Post

its tricky and there are many methods and none is 100% sure to what it really shows. There's still data on stuff we knew for years existing regularly corrected, often with an "maybe" tacked on tho, there are many cool papers about what exoplanets were made of when they crashed into white dwarfs :3

The prevalence of these is probably an artifact of exoplanet detection methods biasing towards small stars and shorter orbit intervals, but *damn* does it feel like missing the goal by inches when they find yet another tidally-locked planet in the habitable zone of a red dwarf