Post

see, this is why i don't play chess with people who *play chess* to me, an unending game where no one wins and no one loses is the perfect game i feel like that *is* winning and real chess players hate it

The funny thing is that a lot of chess experts believe that if both players played perfectly, chess would always end in a draw Chess games only end in victory or defeat because at some point, one fallible human player makes a mistake that the other can capitalise on

From "MASH" after Hawkeye makes a move playing chess with Winchester: Charles: Ah, the infamous Yankakovich gambit! Hawkeye: Oh yeah? Charles: Yankakovich perfected the strategy of making the most moronic move possible, in order to lull his opponent. We-e-ell, I’m not gonna fall for it.

This describes most games with advanced players. They're both using some established strategy they either came up with or read from a book. If something truly unique happens by accident or on purpose by the other player, it just stops them dead in the tracks because creativity wasn't planned for.

Followed the link for this one bc I couldn’t readily find the title text. Felt like browsing a bit, and clicked random, then previous, then random again. The last 2 were about t-distribution and a line of best fit comic which referenced Lorentz distribution. Can you see where I’m going with this?