Post

This post is rhestorical and has no need for a full article. We know why.💰

On the verge of being the one's to break the story of who TSwift actually works for - popcorn is popping, let's all learn together how hard it has been becoming the biggest alt-right trad-wife influencer in the world...

Cause rich? Isn't that the answer to everything?

Elites?🚫 Parasites?✅️

Their privacy is more important than yours or mine. 😒

Get his ass

That last line in the article though. Privacy SHOULDN'T just belong to the rich/famous. It's infuriating that people are ok with blatant surveillance. It is always abused. Those police officers stalking exes, Dolan tracking people critical of him or his venues, politicians tracking their opponents.

Was it full of powerful pedophiles and murderers and rapists? Probably. I like Taylor Swift less and less with each passing day.

Follow the money, of course.

that's different, it wasn't "the unwashed masses", "the teeming hordes", "the madding crewd" notice: the more invasive surveillance stuff they come with... as it comes out, the microsecond it hits the street, it is suddenly essential. hey james mickeymouse dolan maga pos oligarch... f'off, see?

Their guests weren’t security risks.

Team Wired!

One hates to see it. 😞

And for the record I've been a Swifty for years. But there's been some stuff that shes said lately as well as some things involving the last album (besides it being kinda meh, sadly) that kinda seems to tell me the new era she's entering may not be quite as cool as the ones shes left behind

There's an attitude of indifference towards the general masses implied by the term Epstein class along with a presented sense of entitlement. Taylor seems to be rapidly heading that direction lately. Not saying she's there yet but there are some potential red flags here.

🎶 money makes ze world go around🎶

🖕 James Dolan & Taylor Swift

. Because those rules don't apply to the wealthy, famous people. Those rules only apply to us normal folk. Don't you know?

Duh

#PersonOfInterest

Because he’s distributing bovine fecal material.

He didn't want to tick off a billionaire--even a woke one like TSwift.

Weddings are private

She probably wanted them off, since I doubt she made a point of inviting Dolan's enemies and she does security right.

White people

Cause it was a private event...what a stupid question. Focus on shit that matters.

Because it was a private event?

It’s pretty simple. When they rented the place the agreed on a contract which allowed for it to be turned off. He is telling truth. It is essential to the MSG operations security plan when Dolan led events are occurring. This is a non-story.

It’s simple, boycott anyone running that facial recognition technology. See how long they need it then

Good on Taylor. Her wedding was HERs.

I don’t care how secure it is that’s an invasion of quite busy and there’s no way in hell that should be allowed!

Guess they didn’t need your security

I mean it makes sense.

Is it true that one of her guests is a big ICE shot?

Because MAGAs gotta stick together.

They belong to the club, we don't.

Let's put a pin in this. I got a lot on my plate rn.

Because Travis and Tay Tay told that motherfucker to turn that shit completely off while their guests and families celebrated the wedding

Exploitation??

Why? Because Taylor Swift is a billionaire And Dolan runs a performance venue What an incredibly idiotic rhetorical question

I’ve been to the MSG numerous times before there were cameras and it was fine without them so they can’t be that essential

Only celebrities attended.

$$$$

Dolan is such a bitch...

According to the internal document, an MSG executive ordered on July 2 a seven-hour lockdown of the Garden’s video management system “due to a client privacy request.” www.wired.com/story/for-ta...

And create a list of trans people who enter msg, per @pablo.show reporting

He’s paranoid

I’ll tell you why: $$$$$

They didn't want people to know how many Nazis and other fascists were attending #FuckTaylorTwat

Uh GEE, Wired, what a clever take, GEE, LET ME THINK why it might have been disabled... HMMMM GEEE THAT'S A REAL HEAD-SCRATCHER. LOL Wired you fucking kill me

Maybe they demanded it

Probably because Taylor and Travis rented the place and brought their own security. Seems pretty obvious.

It was a private event. Predatory security cameras & face ID could easily be waived in the venue contract.🤷🏼‍♀️ MSG may "justify"👀cameras at public events, for *public* safety. It's smart that Swift protected her own & guest privacy, rather than risk 3rd party profiteers w/access to MSG's system.

They could have powered down the entire network that runs the security system; though, can't imagine security willing to be blind during an event where they need more eyes. The security of the venue is part of the draw. Systems are modern. Doubt they could secure the site without cameras and tech.

Frack MSG... i'm an ole punk and we don't play MSG or any other arena venues, they suck.

Further, why would they ever have done business with Dolan?

Dolan is a clown.

Likely due to the fact that he’s known to use the cams to spy on people for various personal reasons, there’s a good chance this creep has sat in the dark watching some of you on playback. Nobody wants that once the thought is in their head.

Because she’s rich.

They all learned from Epstein. Surveillance everywhere & everyone and look for those snippets that will give you leverage and power over someone else.

@thedailyshow.com

There are the elite, and then everyone else. Two very different sets of rules. It is time.

Wealth seems to have its privileges

It’s because all republicans are corrupt traitors, money launderers, Nazis and pedos. Suck my dick.

Uhmn,…yeah, yeah. It was turned off! Trust me.🤣 Really. MAGA Makin’ America Ghastly(as shit)Again! 👊🇺🇸💩

I forgot when it's your favorite billionaire it's perfectly okay to be an elitist.

Quit simping for billionaires

Not security but we’d sure like sovereignty…….

The cameras must drive a ton of revenue.

She wanted it disabled

Because the people attending this wedding are extremely wealthy so you know there were plenty of criminals.

when does sally bowles besmirch the fuehrer in public?

why are we still talking about this wedding?

He gets a reward for every arrest and it’s also used to track his enemies

Dolan is a paranoid asshole

MSG could have said no.

So the person paying for the venue gets to decide whether it is used or not. I see no problem with that. In fact, I’m surprised that using the system isn’t yet another “add-on” you would at extra for. These venues are famous for their “add-on” charges.

Just, 🤮 So sick of it. This woman is in her mid thirties now. Billionaire or whatever, she’s a rich person who is navigating a vastly different world (despite what her fans believe). Let’s be done with it.

Reason: internal memo noted the shutdown was enacted "due to a client privacy request"Regular security staffers blocked/ forcibly logged off, leaving handful of engineers & leaders active access. Outside-facing security cameras around the perimeter remained active during the multi-day events.

because her goodness stopped the evil.

Eat the rich. That’s why.

Presumably because they paid someone to shut it off

Money buys peace of mind