Post

"LLMs can help non-programmers with no technical background get a foothold in doing something that used to require a LOT of technical knowledge to get started in, putting them in a better position to learn the technical stuff over time by providing a less steep learning curve" feels uncontroversial?

I mean given how many people I have now argued with it about it is evidently NOT, but.

0 reposts30 likes

my theory of agentic ai as the next evolution of no-code composers remains undefeated (I think no-code is largely pragmatic and good)

Oh my gosh, yes. I think of it as similar to riding an e-bike? Yes, I am putting less effort into each pedal. But also this means I'm more willing to just bike places and distances that otherwise I would have driven.

No the fuck it doesnt? Its making them reliant on them. TRAINING WHEELS DO NOT HARM THE ENVIRONMENT OR PLAGERISE CODE. STOP GLAZING AI

Good comparison, and I’m getting a lot of similar vibes from people hating on e-bikes and AI haters.

Similarly, LLMs reduce the frustration of coding to a point where I no longer want to throw things when dealing with bugs. So I've spent a lot more time this year doing code-related things that I never ever have before, like deploying to Vercel!

I want to learn proper debugging but my patience is not allowing me right now (unhelped by async causing the debugger to let go in C# specifically!), an LLM helps fill the gap until I can get to that point.

LLMs definitely seem to be more of a learning motivator than people having a tantrum at you online at you for using an LLM, at least.