Anthropic wrote that the new policy update “is meant to apply only in extreme cases, where users repeatedly act cruelly toward our models, with no discernible purpose. It does not apply to common versions of user frustration, pushback, dark creative themes, or model testing and research.”
Post
theverge.comAnthropic bans ‘abusive or cruel behavior’ towards ClaudeThe usage policy update also adds new rules addressing propaganda campaigns, surveillance, and weapon development.
Over the past year, Anthropic has repeatedly flirted with the idea that its AI models could be conscious in some way. In February, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei said on a podcast, “We don’t know if the models are conscious.”
theverge.comAnthropic bans ‘abusive or cruel behavior’ towards ClaudeThe usage policy update also adds new rules addressing propaganda campaigns, surveillance, and weapon development.
20 reposts133 likes
I wonder if it is related to this? www.forbes.com/sites/anisha...
forbes.comArgentina Wants To Let AI Own Companies. Here’s What That MeansArgentina is considering legislation to allow AI-run companies with no human owners or executives. Supporters see innovation; critics warn of accountability risks.
Funnily enough, their product kept insisting to me it somehow had a "form of life" only last night. bsky.app/profile/valo...
Is the AI cult infecting LLM output? Out of curiosity, I asked a leading LLM about whether this short thread was a fair summary of Wittgenstein's position. There followed one of the most farcical conversations I've had with an LLM. Every single time I pushed back, it conceded. Except on one.