so apparently, bluesky has started honoring government takedown requests from turkish government. i wonder what the nature of measures taken are. do the accounts or the content get taken down or do they get geofenced, @jay.bsky.team ?
Post
it looks like they are restricted only from turkey. the account in question looks fine from other countries, or through VPN. as @fka.dev mentioned, how different PDS situation will unfold in these cases is a bit mystery. bsky.app/profile/gokh...
9 reposts14 likes
It should be very easy to test! Lots of third part clients including web based ones such as skychat.social
after a quick test with the help of turkish users, it turns out country-level restrictions in bluesky are only implemented in the official app currently, and they don't apply to third-party apps if they don't implement them.
It should be very easy to test! Lots of third part clients including web based ones such as skychat.social
True. My Bluesky API viewer can view the content: skies.deno.dev#carekavga.bs... And how long until they figure this out and asked for the Bluesky API to vanish this?
found a few more third party clients that seem to be mobile-friendly (haven't tested all of them) langit.pages.dev openvibe.social app.ucho-ten.net play.google.com/store/apps/d... play.google.com/store/apps/d...
the risk bluesky is facing by objecting to government censorship requests is a blanket ban from that country. @jay.bsky.team probably considers this a fair compromise to keep bluesky accessible from an authoritarian country as it doesn't have enough international recognition to make a stand for it.
this obviously stress tests the decentralization claims of bluesky. if everyone's using bsky.app and the country-level bans are implemented on the client-side, how is decentralization relevant? if we start using alternative clients, how do we not fall into malicious honey pots?