Post

smoking tobacco has gone down similarly in the USA, here it has been replaced with smoking weed instead. It took about 40 years last time to see the effects of widespread cigarette smoking. We'd hope to do better with the effects of widespread weed, except the CDC has been dissolved.. it's up to EU

I tried to quit for 30 years. Patches, Wellbutrin, Chantic, gum, willpower, nothing. Until 2 years ago where I tried Wellbutrin and Chantix both together. In 3 months went frim 15/day to 1-2/day. I drink a lot less, too. It required ZERO willpower!

I was in Edgware General Hospital in London in 1985. At the end of the ward was the TV room where you were free to smoke whilst recovering from your op. The smoking ban was one of the best things, like compulsory seatbelts, genuine lifesavers.

You see that sudden drop in men around 2004 when Shameless first aired and smoking wasn't portrayed as this cool thing to do? I could be looking into things but it could be an indication of how much the media affects society. Which is why I think the BBC needs to push to bring back Police Boxes.

When I was in primary school, c. 1970, my class teacher had an ash tray on his desk and smoked while he talked to kids standing next to him as he marked their work.

I was a student in that period and smoking was heavily marketed to us. Hard to believe now, but I remember the tobacco companies paying pretty girls to dress up in scanty costumes and offer free fags to drunk students in pubs. Unbelievable!

*This is interesting to me... Former Smoker here- was in London last year ♥️. I think almost everyone outside was smoking. Probably the worst aspect of the trip. Smelled like an ashtray.

The indoor smoking ban seems nuts in retrospect. Like why did we all accept inhaling 2nd hand smoke every time we went to a restaurant or pub. Would never accept taking a child to an environment like that now, back then seemed totally normal.

Old enough to have been in a restaurant with dedicated sections for smokers, with basically no effect since the smoke went everywhere. It's crazy to think it was possible to smoke inside, let alone in a place a family would come to eat...

My granny used to have to regularly wash her net curtains due to the hideous staining from their cigarette habit. Back then almost everybody in my family smoked. I cannot remember the last time I saw someone with a cigarette in their hand

In the 1970s, half of men and 40% of women over the age of 16 reported smoking cigarettes. Since then, smoking rates have steadily fallen. By 2023, this was just 12% of men and 10% of women.

This dramatic decline is the result of decades of efforts such as clear warnings on cigarette packs, bans on tobacco advertising, indoor smoking restrictions, and support to help quit. Newer technologies — including vaping products, nicotine patches & medications — have also helped many people quit.

Despite this, smoking remains the leading risk factor for preventable death in the UK, raising the risk of many cancers, heart attacks, and strokes. Fewer smokers means fewer people suffering from these serious diseases.

This survey asks about frequency of use (in categories) rather than amount consumed, so I suspect it will be less vulnerable to that sort of wishful thinking. But obviously all survey based estimates have limitations.

50 years ago, we were FREE to smoke. The cost of 20 cigs has risen by about 2000% since '74, so that, now, 20 a day costs a UK citizen on minimum wage 30% of their net pay. That's driven by a well-meaning public health policy, but let's not kid ourselves: it's coercion, not choice.

Now, that's a good answer. Still, I'm not convinced that coercing people to abandon an addiction is the wisest way to fight it. We're addicted to social media, but nobody argues for a tax on social media posts. Is that a false equivalence? I only think the devil's advocate case is worth making here.

I doubt it's the taxation which is driving change. Education and the change in social norms has reduced the take-up of smoking. And, sadly, health issues have likely reduced the number of older smokers.

This is a shockingly bad graphic, cherry picking the higher (male) rate 50 years ago and the lower (female) rate now, and trying to pretend they are equivalent. It's undoubtedly good news (though without discussing vaping, rather incomplete), but please don't treat us like we're idiots

The label text says “almost half” (ie a rounding of the mean of the male and female rates at the start of the time series) and “about 1-in-10” (a rounding of the mean rate at the end of the time series). The left-hand arrow placement could make that slightly clearer, but it’s not “shockingly bad”.

Meanwhile, here in France. I'm never not shocked to see so many young people smoking. Every doorway, every street is full of people smoking. Despite various indoor bans there is zero social stigma to smoking in France.

My belief is that smoking is one of the only polite ways to talk with strangers in France so it's way harder to kill (also NHS pushed their doctors hard on anti-smoking while France keeps docs more independent)

Oh yeah the cultural value of smoking makes it a permanent force but that's why there was a converted effort in the UK to make it unwanted and socially unacceptable. All measures were used. Smoking now is some odd niche interest.