Post
A few things that stack well together: ORCiD + profile interrogability: showing that a profile has linked ORCiD records, with publications from trusted publishers, that people can inspect, is much more useful than just "has ORCID". @sifa.id could be good for this.
Institutional email verification: confirming they hold an address on the domain of the institution they claim affiliation with. Ringgold IDs www.copyright.com/solutions-ri... are genuinely useful for recognising institutions here. Then badge it transparently for audiences.
No single service has complete data or total assurance. Multiple data points + transparency to relevant audiences is the approach that actually builds trust, especially since we know bad-faith authors and publishers exist, and letting audiences interrogate that is healthier than false confidence.
0 reposts2 likes
Yeah, for many things, there are no black/white assurances. Partly why I'm building @sifa.id without a single "verification" checkmark, but with layers of different trust signals/verifications so you as a consumer can pick what is of value to you