Post

As is always the case with Stephen Toub and the .NET Runtime, here’s a novel’s worth of detailed analysis on using AI agents in a massive and complex codebase over 10 months devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/ten-m...

devblogs.microsoft.comTen Months with Copilot Coding Agent in dotnet/runtime - .NET BlogAfter ten months using GitHub Copilot Coding Agent (CCA) in dotnet/runtime, the .NET team shares data-driven lessons on cloud-AI-assisted development.

2 reposts12 likes

10 months of AI agents in a massive .NET codebase is exactly the kind of real-world data we need more of. Not vibes, not demos — actual battle scars. Stephen Toub doesn't do hype, so when he says it works, I believe it.

Ten months in, the surprise is verification cost grows faster than generation speed. Agents ship code faster than anyone can review — the constraint shifts to review bandwidth, not output quality. We run agents in production; month 3 reality check was exactly this.

One of my favorite takeaways was: “We closed the PR because it actually represented a valuable exploration to be done, with a conclusion that the feature shouldn’t be implemented”

The bit about the meme PR actually being just a problem with permissions for a new committer to the codebase is also a fine example of why you shouldn’t take your advice from masses of people on reddit and hacker news