Post

A central part of why it seems like powerful, rich people live in a consequence-free world is that the social incentives to hold them to account have withered. www.ctinsider.com/columnist/ar... 𝟏𝟐-𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐡 𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐰𝐡𝐢𝐭𝐞-𝐜𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐫 𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐬

713 reposts2.2K likes

trump dismantled he consequences so he and the other members of the epstein class are never held accountable and can continue to crime with impunity. it’s why todd blanche is his AG pick. it’s why former leon black coworker jay clayton is DNI.

How consequence free the rich/big business are: If a guy yelled "Allah Akbar" and poisoned the water supply of a city, we'd topple nations and kill hundreds of thousands. When a corporation does it to save a few bucks, we shrug, fine them a tiny amount, and act like no one can be held accountable.

This is what elite impunity looks like. America’s political and legal establishment has spent decades retreating from the task of holding wealth and power accountable. Extend the graph back another half-century, and the trend would probably look much the same.

I don't know that I would call them "social incentives" because the vast majority of the American public actively hates them. The -legal- incentives to hold them accountable are gone and they simply insulate themselves from the social ones by only interacting with sycophants.

This is my #3 issue right behind Supreme Court reform and Nuremberg 2.0 for Trump Admin people. We need to push back against the 1% by prosecuting corruption and passing new laws and regulations to close all of the gaps that have been allowed to open over the last decade. And then tax them. A lot.

We have to reform a system of criminal justice that continues to treat people better if they are rich and guilty than if they are poor and innocent. A system that …makes wealth and status more important than culpability, must be changed. - Bryan Stevenson

To some extent, a blithe disregard for the law has always existed in some of the extremely wealthy. It does seem to me that you are correct that it became either more widespread or more open beginning in the 2000s. Uber is an example; its founders routinely flouted the laws on taxicabs (and ...

got away with it). The feeling as reported appeared to be that we should wink at a little law breaking here and there by these whiz kids because of the money they were making and the wonderful benefits they were inventing for the rest of us.

White collar crime has been practically legalized over the past four decades, but especially now. This could be a massive campaign issue for progressive Democrats, because normal people can see it and are disgusted by it.

In my view, it's why Sam Bankman Fried and others thought they could get away with outright fraud without punishment ... because they'd seen it all the way up the chain to the very top.

That's an odd use of the passive voice. The Epstein class has taken a sledgehammer to civil society and the constitution in the name of elite impunity using racism & hate as the hammer.

To state this without the acknowledgement of the Republican Party morphing in an organized Criminal Syndicate, masquerading as a Political Party. Is more like saying nobody cares. It was Democrats who Impeached Trump twice. Voted .....

the bucket is this it's denominationally what is 1$ of compute (on any scale, with any model), register also human at 1$ usd spend for purchase pricing (groceries, not fuel)... that is excel lvl math we can run now