Post

Clarification: this refers to the Shah-era Iranian flag, not every Iranian flag. Per NYT reporting, FIFA barred that version of the Iranian flag. The point of the video is that FIFA claims to be apolitical while deciding which political/national symbols fans may display. That is newsworthy.

I am currently hanging my American flag upside down outside my home. I bought upside down American flag earrings to wear on the 4th of July. If I had been there, I’d be in jail right now because I would have chucked that lady onto the soccer field! SO LIVID at all of this!!!

I understood they were specifically taking away the pre-1979 flags as provocative political symbols, and not the current flags of the Islamic Republic. I may be wrong, so do correct me if I am.

Okay, so pre-current regime flags of (the IR of) Iran are FIFA prohibited political speech. What about pre-current regime flags of other participating countries? If a Korean fan, rooting on South Korea brought the pre-division flag, would FIFA prohibit it? How about a unified Yugoslavian flag?

I have no idea (and do not have an NYT subscription). I doubt FIFA or other fans brought their concerns to court. I read about the pre-revolution IRR/FIFA litigation/ruling from a different news source. Litigation is not a necessary precursor for consistent event policy and rules for fan conduct.

HUGE MISSING INFO; FIFA is bowing to the demand from IRAN that "OLD; PRE-REVOLUTIONARY flags (The Lion and the SUN flags) are politcal statements that are banned under FIFA rules.

Constitution says that the government cannot restrict speech (unless it is dangerous speech), not that private events can’t limit free speech. FIFA can limit speech at their events just like you can kick someone out of your house if they say something offensive to you.

Remember that America pressured against Puerto Rican flags in the States and on the island as well, claiming they were politics statements too. This, at a time when PRs were being heavily monitored by the FBI for almost 30 years.

Iran probably also demanded FIFA let them stay in the country where they have matches... and went another way, so it's interesting which ones they insist on and which ones are flexible.

WTAF?? How is that ok? They're supporting their team! You admitted them, you took their money! Not their fault YOUR president started a war with their country for no reason!

They are literally doing the opposite of what you state, these are Iranian exiles flying the flag of the Shah specifically to antagonize the Iranian national team, and they knew the flag would be banned beforehand. Please read literally anything about this stuff before popping off.

Ok,I've read & listened to several overviews.So there were some Iranian exiles waving the flag that implies support for monarchy & some flags(no crown)that support NOT THE REGIME,but rather actual DEMOCRACY.Divisive?Yes,maybe,but they've the right to express their views too.& FIFA efforts stopped.

Hiding your credentials while trying to enforce FIFA "rules" is like masked law enforcement (not as extreme of course). No enforcement without identification.

It’s exhausting all this hatred. I wake up happy and by about 930 I’m fucking pissed off! I hate this country and what we have become I just wish all my fellow Americans realized the shit hole country we live in now.

If FIFA and sponsors cared 0.001% as much about football as the players and fans, the world would be such a better place. It's just a sick, corrupt bunch of oligarchs hoarding cash for themselves.

Freedom of speech does not apply in private facilities. I think FIFA is dumb for this but if they were in public (sidewalk for example) then the flag can’t be banned but private facilities can set rules for what is or is not allowed.

The important and omitted context is that FIFA is going this at the request of the Iranian government because these are pre-revolutionary flags. Let’s at least be angry for the right reasons.

If someone had a us flag with trumps ugly face in the middle would they confiscate that? MAGA hats? Not being smart ass, genuinely curious

NYT was just the first search result and it's straightforward reporting: FIFA got a court to uphold its ban on this specific flag. As to what that flag means, this post and its follow-up are less simplistic than what I said:

H R Pickens@hrpickens.bsky.social

On just a bit of half-assed googling, I get the idea that the "lion and sun" flag is...really complicated? IIUC it was in use in both the Democratic Interlude and the Late Pahlavi era, and today is more broadly seen as an anti-IRI symbol and not specifically monarchist? Except...

Thanks for the clarification! I'll sleep better knowing that Samuel Alito personally went down there to make sure people could fly whatever flag they wanted

I suppose the real question is, why would we disapprove of a flag used in resistance against the current regime? Given how much we've spent bombing the Revolutionary Guard, you would have thought the pre-1979 flag would be freely distributed, not confiscated. Weird.

What a piss poor, bitch ass racist display !!! 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬. I would have charged 🌮, another 300 billion, JUST for this punk ass shit ‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️🤬

Didn’t FIFA itself showcase all the countries flags IN THE STADIUM during the opening games??!! This is unacceptable.

By now it should be pretty obvious how corrupt FIFA is to the entire world. Best way to address their corruption is turn off your television, don't share, don't promote this corruption spectacle that benefits a greedy few and the administration that was coddled with a "peace prize."

Showing exactly what a corrupt farce having the World Cup in the U.S. was & is for all to see. To add to this, for everyone who is ignornant enough to not know- The whole purpose of the Iran-not a War, not a Police Action ? Was a a cover to bankrupt the U.S..

The other statement for those not in step- 1-A MOU is not a legal statute, not a law by any definition, nor a binding Contract. 2-A question no one has asked is can a Nation who did not by any standard declare War on another Nation: now say any "Peace Treaty" subsequent is valid on it's face ?

In particular, where the inferior regime is an idiot-puppet bully for a genocidal maniac, and it’s said “not a war” excursion bore no valid purpose other than to steal land, pilfer & extort unimaginably vast sums of money & murder as many innocents as inhumanly possible.

Espically when the afore said "inferior regime" has an President, Cabinet, Administration & substantial portion of it's Congress, went forward with the core intent of eviscerating its taxpayer coffers, for self enrichment.

She could have not enforced that rule, or not continued executing the job. When they're asking you to be their censorship soldier and they have you wearing a name tag you need to reevaluate what you stand for personally.