Post

It’s a good thing this architecture professor got the windowless bedrooms that were often marketed to low-income college students banned. Otherwise these kids might be forced to live in inhumane conditions. (Picture completely unrelated.)

Patrick Siegman@siegman.biz

What share of architecture programs require students to pass an economics class to graduate? I ask because this story profiles the architect who just persuaded the ICC to ban windowless bedrooms in its model building code. It offers zero consideration of how this will affect building costs or rents

57 reposts387 likes

i don't think windowless bedrooms would be remotely necessary given actual yimby policies, and going to the mat to defend them seems like a distraction and bad idea.

Where I live (UK, nimby paradise) we simultaneously have loads of people living in tents while working, and politicians banning various forms of housing that they consider to be "inhumane" or otherwise sub-standard

That living situation has been the case for UCSB and Santa Barbara City College students for at least three decades. Doesn't help that what available housing there is in the area keeps falling into the ocean

much worse since they've started enforcing the code on how many people can live in one house. and I'm really not joking about the houses in IV that have been red-tagged over the years

This is exactly my thought. Well into my twenties I was going to some trouble to make my bedroom SEEM windowless lol. last thing I wanted to see was sunlight in the bedroom

The windowless bedrooms were not a low-cost building! They weren't an attempt to maximize density in a restricted footprint, but rather had extensive social spaces with windows and then tiny windowless bedrooms to get students not to spend time in their bedrooms.

No. Important context to the munger cube, which was a huge part of why it got canceled, wad that it was a huge risk for spread of covid when it was being proposed. Poor ventilation would have made that worse.

Eh. The double-loaded corridor is perfectly fine for dorms. Make the building 20 m thick, put a 2 m wide corridor, make all the studios 3.33*9 = 30 m^2, put public spaces at the windowed corners. Everyone gets a nice studio with a window, a private bathroom with a shower, and a kitchenette.

3.33 is around 3 internal, which allows for a bathroom of around 1.8*1.5 without disturbing the rest of the unit, which allows a decent if not amazing bathtub. It's a very solid place to live in; in Stockholm I had a smaller apartment as a postdoc, thanks to extremely high market rents.

It's a general problem with US dorms - too much space in the wrong place, too little private room space. Munger Hall's 35 m^2/student is typical, but instead of getting solo 30 m^2 studios, students share 15 m^2 rooms in the typical American dorm while still having to pay for the 35 + RA labor.