Post

I spent more time on this piece than almost anything else I've written in the last year. Building a better, more decentralized internet is an inherent necessity if you want a functioning democracy. I hope people find it a useful encapsulation of where we're at. www.liberalism.org/p/enshittifi...

liberalism.orgEnshittification, Despotification, and the Open InternetIt’s not about whether technology is inherently good or bad, liberating or oppressive. Architecture shapes incentives; incentives shape outcomes.

645 reposts1.9K likes

Masnick's article at LiberalismOrg ends with the sentence "The alternative is already visible. Two photos, fourteen years apart." I expected to see 2 photos. I have no idea what this is referring to. His article contains no photos.

The 1st link leads to a page with a single photo… the paragraph describes the scenario, but it doesn't directly mention the photo. The 2nd link leads to an article with multiple photos in it, I think you're referencing the 2nd photo and you have to scroll ½way down, may lead to some confusion.

As I reflect more on what you wrote, it's not that spaces can't necessarily HAVE algorithms, it's that recommendation algorithms when present should be like I tried to develop when I was at reddit that are "wide to wide" or "narrow to wide" rather than "wide to narrow" or worse, "narrow to narrower"

Thanks for this piece. Well framed lifecycle of the social media ecosystem. I was excited by the breakdown of barriers that the early internet provided. This has devolved into an abject desire to become a Luddite. You have provided hope that there is a roadmap to a better future.

Enjoyed the big picture but up-to-date take you wrote here. Reading it, I kept thinking about Timothy Mitchell's argument about how the difference in the degree of centralization needed to extract energy from coal vs. oil led to very different political systems in the 19th vs. 20th centuries.

The renewable era allows for more decentralized energy and hopefully a similar change in other areas of society. I recently heard a theory that we are due in the US for a shakeup in the political system which usually happens about every 60 years ands the energy system shift would dovetail nicely.

I just finished creating a training for reporters and editors on how to use bluesky, and I was so struck by how social media via open protocol is so much closer to the dream of the early internet than whatever we have now

It always makes me sad to think how much different things would be now if the original dream of migrating the Twitter bird to the open-protocol "blue sky" came to fruition

The key argument is that centralized systems aren't *just* leading to enshittification (a la @doctorow.pluralistic.net), but also to "despotification." The centralized systems create chokepoints that become targets not just of profit rent seekers, but political ones as well.

See also the change of science grants being approved by political flunkies not peer review. Peer review isn’t perfect, but what gets funded based on greed is not ‘pure’ science. What needs to be researched won’t be. Bureaucracy is not in itself evil.

Control over centralized chokepoints becomes a team effort between those seeking to extract both economic & political power.

But a key point in all of this: if everyone just passively accepts what's given to us, we don't reach that better, more decentralized, more democratic world (hey look where things stand today). It requires making some key choices.

Fantastic piece! Enjoyed reading and I'm a fan of Doctorow. 'Locked open' concept is great and I get the benefits of pushing power to the users to prevent enshit'n. How does this work in practice? Who gets funding to start these ventures? What mechanisms ensure their survival? Who's doing it now?

Interesting piece. But today’s choke points are built right on top of neutral tech like http, dns, git, Linux. Ultimately a distributed protocol needs to pair with a distributed economic model or extractors will capture it.

Crypto is tainted, but something akin to its founding ideas. Attempts to build a “global co-op” network haven’t succeeded but something like that seems to be needed for an open internet to truly re-emerge imo.

I was a little puzzled until I worked out that "despotification" was rooted in "despot", rather than "despotify" (de-spotify), which sounded like a positive step in the opposite direction.

I think Bluesky's cultural problems kinda highlight its limitations; most people like the "defaults" provided by centralization, and complain instead of migrating when there's a conflict between their preferences and whatever service provider they are using.

I'm kicking around the idea that AI could actually help a lot with this - among a lot of other things the AI tools are already at or near a point where they could provide a good "algorithm" matching your preferences replacing the discover feed, to use the bluesky example.

I have ideas about that too, which in large part involves smarter clients and more efficient indexes so it's practical. Stuff like more practical "multi homing", and there's already some partial view + backfill appviews which can do much of this as a kind of censorship resistance technique