Post

The Map Center
@mapcenter.com

This is also true of cartography in my experience. Presenting someone with the familiar is good for reaffirming your priors but for true lovers of maps, they're not just information but the pleasure of surprise, realization, connection and discovery. There's not much to discover in the familiar.

Bugs 🔜 MC Atlanta@bugsmaytrix.bsky.social

maybe i'm old fashion but the coolest thing about video games is being taken to new worlds that i hadn't thought up and experiencing something exciting that the artists behind the game want to show me

5 reposts42 likes

Surprised Eel Historian, PhD
@greenleejw.bsky.social

As a kid, I would spend hours poring over maps of distant places, letting the map feed my imagination. As a nominal adult who draws maps for a living, I’d add that one of my favorite parts of my work is getting to map someplace (or some time) that’s wholly new to me.

The Map Center
@mapcenter.com

YES! I think most GIS people have had the experience of becoming intimately familiar with a specific place from maps and satellite images and data. And then. Going there. For the first time. And seeing how it is still both recognizable and strange.

Brad Neuhauser
@burakkorii.bsky.social

I often edit municipal boundaries after annexations, and have had this experience many times! Reminds me that the overhead view and the view from the ground are often very different perspectives, but both have a lot of value.

The Map Center
@mapcenter.com

A hot buzzword in GIS right now is "Digital Twin" which is a nearly complete copy of reality in a computer model. These look awesome and can be genuinely useful. But I already live in reality! Show me something different! Show me a slice of your reality that makes me question mine.

Oggie
@oggie.bsky.social

You know what genuinely hasn't been done enough? Full models of science fiction world maps. Sure, we get the equivalent of hand drawn overlays, but where are the tectonic plate mappings, the subduction zones, even the water tables of Zorblax 3? Yes yes unobtainium, but show me erosion patterns

Dhruv Kapri
@dhruv-kapri.bsky.social

Abstraction is the whole value. When I scored ~100k DC rooftops from LiDAR for solar, the useful layer wasn't a copy of the roof but a few numbers per roof: usable area, plane tilt, shaded radiation, annual kWh. What slice would you want twins to show instead?

The Map Center
@mapcenter.com

All maps are wrong. This is not a bug, it is a feature. That's the whole point. We already have an entire planet waiting for you outside. A map is useful because it condenses, slices and reveals something that we can't get from a person's vantage point. A map is useful because of its abstraction.

Oggie
@oggie.bsky.social

God yes. The Mercator projection, as rightly attacked as it is, is inaccurate. But it's also -accurate- because it's explicitly designed to be used for coast mappings. That mattered more than precision! That's literally teaching history!

The Map Center
@mapcenter.com

Mercator maps don't belong in elementary schools AND I hate to hear folks ragging on it for being "inaccurate." Hey, that inaccurate map was a revolution and it took a lot of work, ok? Put some respect on Mercator's name!

Mike McGrew
@zavcurrent.bsky.social

Here is a map that gives you everything: every GIS layer is turned out. It also, paradoxically, tells you nothing. Mapping is in many ways like storytelling or video games: so much of the effort isn't in building information, it's in stripping away the excess info so your meaning becomes clear.

The Map Center
@mapcenter.com

So if your map is a perfect facsimile of reality, I want you to tell me what the use case is. Who is this for? What problem does it solve? Why do I need it when I can just go outside and touch grass for myself?