Post

Preserving history is good. Trapping a city in amber and converting a thriving, evolving, innovative and dynamic place for millions of people to live into a museum for the rich is bad. It is an economic, cultural and social justice nightmare. (Hope you're taking notes, Rhode Island)

Open New York@opennewyork.org

Since 1966, historic districts have steadily expanded to cover much of Lower Manhattan. As more areas are covered, new housing is effectively banned there, driving displacement and higher rents.

Why is Newport stuck in the Gilded Age? They had 400 years of pirates, smugglers, planters, free Black folks, Native Americans, whalers, Quakers, gay sailors... Newport has been all of those things! Its past and image were intentionally flattened to flatter mostly one type of history.

Italo Calvino wrote "The Infinite Cities" to argue that each city contains infinite perspectives. My Pawtucket is different than yours and my Pawtucket next year will be different still. We should preserve not for the sake of a single aesthetic but as a reminder of all the things we have been.

I think there should be some temporal equity here. Preserving all that we have been. Preserving the pathways towards all that we could yet become.

0 reposts8 likes