Post

Who said anything about "good faith" ? Also... "Read up" on something that's been dominating the political discourse for almost a year ? Really ?

Couldn’t one build a pretty nice and complete building for 250M?

Why redactions? This was a planned renovation of a public space. No confidential or top secret national security info should be in this report, nor names of victims of abuse that need to be kept private. So whose butt is being protected this time?

Yeah. They'll get right on that...after about 35 appeals.

Good. Now arrest people

While Mrs. Robert Kraft is at it, maybe she could unseal her side piece. I'm guessing he's a Republican, 30ish, dreamy eyes, regular Fox or CNN contributor. Typical Beltway scumbag.

Which will certainly include the plans for post-demo, brand new Trump Center For The Arts.

Fuck yeah!

And remove the scaffolding and cover on the entry to the facility????

…and when they don’t do it. What happens then 🤷‍♂️

Its a start.

Our courts are keeping him in check….to a degree.

They might want to ensure the safety of the many gifts housed in the Kennedy Center. I wonder how much money they are receiving for the Steinway piano or other items that used to be in the Kennedy Center.

oh boy i cant wait for nothing to become of this

…empty binders…

Lies and the coverup, can’t wait to read it all.

Good!

WHY ARE REDACTIONS ALLOWED? these aren't the #EPSTEIN files!

BREAKING looool motherfuckers.....🤣🤣

Munitions storage

It will one page with heavy redactions, unless they refuse to comply and cry "national security", then run to SCOTUS.

Does the order specify who’s going to jail when they ignore it.

They won’t obey judge order

Not holding my breath for that to happen

They will never unseal it.

Must? Who’s going to make them? Seriously, there have been so many things the courts have said this administration “must” do. You know, like release the Epstein files. We’re still waiting for the to do that. I’m won’t hold my breath on this one.

Redactions be like "because President trump said so", "because President trump likes", "President trump's design", etc, etc.

"with redactions" = every page redacted lol

Because he's really into compliance...

Trump and Co are just gonna totally ignore this…

Perhaps the first time in history someone has demanded to see a PowerPoint presentation.

Why in God's name would such a report need redactions? We gonna fight over these redactions too?

Bravo 👏!

OH SHIT MAN - those #Jesus powerpoints used to SLAY my Mom's Windows XP machine

I’ll bet we can guess where a lot of that money would be going.

Why isn't the Kennedy Center being seized under conservatorship since the board has failed in its mandate? Or is that one goal of this judicial process?

I imagine something like:

You mean a ballroom. 🤣 Since ballrooms are now national security for the Trump administration.

😂 A whole theater turned into a War Room? Now that sounds like they’re taking this way too seriously. 🍿

The Kennedy Center is critical in preventing a large mineshaft gap with Russia.

Will it get turrets, drone or both?

😂 Oh boy… here we go! I’m ready—3, 2, 1…

NSO has drones hidden in their xylophones. Obviously. 🙄

It may contain some epstein victims' (better known as the perps) identification information.

When did the Kennedy Center board become a secret cabal of loonies? Oh right…

Another cover up

All the CSAM.

Defense: trump lawyers argued the presidents statements/conversations at board meetings are privileged Plaintiff: argued that trump statements made in his capacity as chairperson of the board and not as president. Trumps handpicked board majority elected trump as chairperson.

I think you’re on to something.

Got to redact Trump's orders and threats. Report is going to end up black page after black page.

Anything that would otherwise cause somebody to need to take the 5th Amendment to avoid incriminating themselves. Like who they were bribing, and how much, and for what, and how much of a cut various Trump businesses got.

Haha has some explaining to do!

Who’s gonna make ‘em?

What could possibly need to be redacted other than wrong doing? 🤦🏻‍♀️

2/authority is vested. W resp to public property, Art IV Sec 3 Cl 2.

NATIONAL SECURITY!!!!! Snipers in the lighting! Drones one the roof!

Yeah. I’m sure they’ll obey THESE court orders right away! Just like they’ve obeyed the countless other court orders levied against them previously. Until some mother fuckers are thrown in an actual jail cell, nothing is going to happen!

Damn, someone better write that report, fast. I am pretty sure it was just a title page and 162 blank pages no one ever thought would be read! Or maybe page 2 says, "because Trump made us do it."

Why are there redactions???

PowerPoint has brought about the downfall of so many meetings! Bring it on’

Oh fuck I hope that PowerPoint has at least one star wipe transition

They won't

😂 Oh, this is going to be a complete disaster in the funniest way possible. Nothing beats control freaks discovering that their own paperwork has other plans. 🍅

The order gives the board until Oct 14 to propose "narrowly tailored" redactions to the JLL plan, with written justifications. Should be interesting to see how much of a $250M renovation plan they can argue is a state secret.

NO redactions…!

And the tarp?

Every time I see these judgements I ask myself a simple question. Who’s going to make them unseal the evidence. Haven’t seen any sign of law enforcement in the US when it comes to cases like this in a few years.

I imagine tons of no bid contracts to cronies and friends.

It’s an entertainment venue. What possible “redactions” might there be? It’s not NATSEC.

Wait! Why the F*** does a report on a renovation need REDACTIONS?!?!

Add to the pile of "Judicial orders to be ignored".

I can see why you feel that way. Transparency matters, especially when a court is making decisions that affect the public.

There's artwork and other items of value that will disappear during the "renovations".

Good. Unseal all of it. Transparency cuts both ways.

They won’t. They’ll be sued/held in contempt. Nothing will happen. Rinse and repeat.

Ok ok ok….so when they don’t do that??

Just another court order he won’t follow. What’s the difference?

Que up the appeal and delays.

That’s a fair question. If there’s no legitimate security or privacy concern, it’s reasonable to ask why anything needs to be redacted at all.

Has anyone ever gone to court before to demand they be shown the powerpoint presentation

I wish the court would force them to take down the goddamned tarp

Good. Sealing occasionally makes sense, but I can't think of any legit reason why construction project details for an arts center using our tax dollars (or bribe $ to the admin?) should be kept under seal. These docs shouldn't include nuclear secrets, private medical info, or classified state info.

What prevents them from simply "pulling a trump" and defying the judge's orders?

Knowing what we know today, plans for the Kennedy center iwill likely see another 'Best little whorehouse in DC'.

OK, but just a sec, they're a little busy with that Epstein file release right now.

The board needs to be prosecuted by the next AG.

what are they hiding??

That was my question- who needs protection on a building plan?

Why on earth would there need to be redactions????

What are the chances they'll comply?

Unseal the curtain covering the Kennedy Center

Exactly! 😂 It’s an entertainment venue, not classified military intelligence. You’d think they could just release the damn report.

...and they'll ignore it, and 34Felonies will have the building demolished because he didn't get his way, like a toddler smashing the toy he wants because he's been told no.