Post

Over at the newsletter I wrote about Mark Ruffalo's showdown with Paramount:

I can’t think of any media consolidation that genuinely benefited the customers or most employees, not that those factions matter when the only game in town is C-suite maneuvering and stock valuations.

it's really not subtle! Yet if you read most media coverage of media mergers it's just...not deemed contextually relevant. Curious how that works!

Being thinking a lot of how tech abetting media consolidation just destroys utterly a framework of understanding anything outside of the frames of the owner class. Entire valid points of view that won’t even get a iota of thought.