Post

this New York Times article on the SpaceX IPO spends more time talking about the company's IPO day party plans and decor than they do the fact this is all a giant unworkable con orchestrated by an overt white supremacist huckster

I'm genuinely fascinated by this sort of weird pseudo-journalism. It vaguely looks like journalism but it doesn't actually care about labor, ethics, real-world impact, or even that the key IPO architect is an overt authoritarian

If those are too hard, there's also the more simple question of "is this valuation warranted?" and "why is SpaceX bundled with grok and twitter?". Those seem like important questions when pronouncing someone a trillionaire based on the stock prices of companies with very little free float