NY Magazine is a usually a great publication, but this article is a logically incoherent “flooding the zone with shit” take. G&T programs for sure are imperfect, but this long article adds nothing useful to the discussion.
Proponents of Gifted & Talented programs have promoted the notion that the smartest children need extra enrichment to reach their potential and that we can measure the beneficial impact on the children who receive it. But not a single part of this story is true, reports Katie Arnold-Ratliff.
1 repost0 likes