Post

The Asahi folks outlined their observations: The legal pitfalls in their specific field, the lack of thought on many generated contributions in code, documentation or discussion, and also the environmental impact. Granted, they used "slop" heavily and you might want to tone-police that if you must.

The weird thing is that the legal aspect is actually a decent point, but they completely defeat it with all the extra language. Why not just say that they can't accept LLM-driven contributions as long as the legal situation is unresolved? Everyone would accept and understand this.