Post

Haz
@haz.dev

AI is really bad at design, even Claude. But GPT models are painfully worse. Even when you're iterating, they're more likely to make suboptimal design decisions unless you guide them down to the tiniest detail. Claude (even Opus) will at least get *some* of those tiny details right.

garrison
@garrison.corporate.fm

anthropic launched a dedicated "Claude Design" feature several months ago, but I haven't heard much about it since. did you ever try it, and if so is it any better?

Haz
@haz.dev

Yes, it's the best we have right now, at least for graphic design (not design in general). But getting a good result still takes a lot of iteration and specific guidance. For example, it generated this atrocious table of contents in one of my sessions:

0 reposts6 likes

conputer dipshit
@davidcrespo.bsky.social

heh yeah I use them for UI work all the time. was surprised to find for example that despite Astra being insane at 3D work, it can’t fucking tell whether text in a box has even spacing around it

garrison
@garrison.corporate.fm

do you think there's some gell-mann amnesia here? i.e. would a 3D artist have similar gripes? I don't think there's any question astra was a big improvement, though