Post

Imagine a world where there's only one brand of car. Yeah... not great. That’s basically what’s happening with your browser. Let’s do a deep dive 👇1/7

42 reposts270 likes

I’ve been using Firefox as exclusively as possible for years and have been quite happy with it. Combined with Nord VPN, Incogni, and the Ghostery extension the number of junk calls I’ve gotten has dropped to zero. Thank you for making a useful browser.

The near-monopoly of Chromium is a problem, and a reason I'm a Firefox supporter, but this thread got many facts incorrect. - Chromium is not an engine. It's engine is a fork of WebKit called Blink. - Blink and WebKit are also open-source. - Ad-blocker limits in Chrome are unrelated to the engine.

The general thesis of the thread is spot-on (more voices in the market means more interests are represented in the development of the web), but getting these basic facts wrong makes the argument sound disingenuous and hurts the cause. Please do better when posting about this stuff.

1. Chromium is used interchangeably with Blink (in fact, most people don't know what Blink is) 2. We were referring to Safari, which is part of Apple's closed ecosystem. But you're right. 3. Our independence enables innovation that Google wouldn’t fund on its own like ad blockers

Fair enough, but it's important when making these kinds of arguments to reduce ambiguity. For example, if most people don't know what Blink is, and your goal here is to explain rendering engines, it's bad form to perpetuate the ignorance.

I will switch exclusively to Firefox and even pay a considerable amount for a browser that lies to data harvesters. We can't stop the collection without basically giving up the web. But we can make their databases unreliable and less profitable. Enshitify the enshitifiers!

Most browsers are built on Chromium (aka Google’s engine). The other big player? Safari. It runs on WebKit, a closed-source browser engine with limited flexibility. 2/7

So why does that matter? A few reasons: less options means only 1 or 2 companies are deciding how you browse online and what features get developed (or not) 4/7

A good example of this are adblockers! Having a seat at the table means giving you a real choice so you can browse on your terms. 5/7

This is a fine thread, but when you're all putting the same crappy AI into your browsers then it doesn't matter which one we pick, we still end up with the same disaster at the end of it. PLEASE stop trying to put AI in here!

We hear your concerns, and that’s why our approach is different. We run AI features on your device so data remains local, and you can remove downloaded models anytime. We believe in giving consumers a choice: you decide if, and how you want to use AI.

Stop automatically adding AI 'features' to your product. I am constantly tripping over AI bullshit I have to manually disable or remove and it's exhausting. Nobody wants or is asking for this crap and you're forcing it on everyone by default in a way that is identical to every other company.

We appreciate everyone's feedback here! It's important to note that these features are optional, off by default, and local models are downloaded if the feature is used. This won't please everyone but we do want to provide more context into how we're approaching it.

AI is a fad that's not even that good. Every product pushes AI nowadays but it's not necessary. I wish the core product would get a lot more attention, and for stuff like the link agregator to have remained. You lay off 30% of staff that could help, but keep paying the CEO over 7 mil. And add execs.

I agree wholeheartedly. Now stop paying your CEO over 7 million dollars and stop hiring a ton of executives and get good programmers to make Firefox the best it could be. You can't ask people for donations if a huge chunk of it goes to management. It's not that complex.

I have used Firefox for so long that I can't remember anymore. It's flexible, and I love how I am able to install various extensions that help prevent tracking and block annoying ads on YouTube. You can't do that on Chrome or MS Edge...😁

I use @firefox.com daily, and I support the engine alternative. But I am skeptical of the management layer of the organization behind it. I fear that poor technical decisions will ruin the product. More time and effort should be put into the core (the engine) and less on AI related stuff.