Post

Right, another key thing that historians do is working with important records that have not been digitized. And the vast majority of the world’s records *have not been digitized* and thus do not exist in any format that LLMs/AI can work with.

This post is unavailable.

I (naively I guess) assumed that Google at least has warehouses with machines pulling stuff off of old floppies and CDROMs just like their book digitization infrastructure

thanks that was a really interesting and thought-provoking piece...I think before reading it I would have *tentatively* disagreed with your claim about how much has been digitized, but on a moment's thought that's obviously a reflection of my Western/Northern/otherwise-default mode of existence

I think part of it is that Google Books is limited to published works that are easily-available to be scanned. So much of the historical record is in unique ledgers or archives held in local offices. Kevin Kruse has a great thread about the importance of primary sources bsky.app/profile/kevi...

Kevin M. Kruse@kevinmkruse.bsky.social

This is why it’s so important to trace things back to the beginning whenever possible. I believe @rauchway.bsky.social calls these “historical urban legends”