Post
8/ The argument for appeasement is that a rate of 10-15% with a lot of carveouts is unpleasant but manegable and isn't likely to lead to a flood of recalibrated supply chains. Moreover, a deal offers predictability at a time when that's what investors and business is craving.
9 reposts87 likes
We all KNOW that the producers now KNOW we will gladly pay the fucking tariffs in many instances & in a system that ONLY ratchets up, TRUMP & his fucking shitty deal-making is only making EVERY AMERICAN poorer. WE'LL NEVER SEE THE PRICES RELENT bc Americans are so uneducated they chose HIM. We suck.
Sigh. It's all so predictable ... “It’s a nice number but it’s just not realistic,” said Warren Patterson, head of commodities strategy at ING Bank. “You’d essentially have to divert all energy trade. That’s just not possible.” www.wsj.com/business/ene...
And its not easier when you add the "Member state factor". bsky.app/profile/sand...
@nixonsimon.bsky.social lays out in a few sentences why Europe has been so tame in the trade war. Generous reading is that Europeans worried too much for Ukraine. Ungenerous reading is EU politicians were weak.