Post

holy shit. Trump's "Executive Board of Peace" is being set up to replace/undermine the United Nations. It's not just about imposing the "20-point" plan on Gaza. It'll be to legitimize things like invading Venezuela and kidnapping Maduro - because obviously if they're making the rules, it's okay.

So when Carney accepts the invitation to be on the board, he - and probably a lot of the others accepting the invite - are looking to be part of this New World Order. Whatever qualms they say about Trump/fascism are of a lesser priority than ensuring they are part of the in-group, and not left out.

3/ Now they're reporting it will cost $1B for Carney to join Trump's New World Order executive board. Carney's reason for joining, of course, is "because it is important to have a seat at the table to shape this process from within." It's IMPORTANT to be a part of undermining the rules-based order

4/ Here's Canada's PM Mark Carney on the hot seat about signing up to be one of the founding executives of Trump's New World Order. Will he pony up the $1 billion? He's unclear. Earlier article: "A Canadian government official clarified to POLITICO that Canada will not pay for a seat on the board"

5/ Mark Carney is trending #1 on Bsky right now. Because... he's saying the stuff out loud, that the much vaunted (while hypocritical) "rules-based international order" is over and isn't coming back. He is justifying his buy-in of Trump's New World Order exec board, to "change it from the inside".

6/ Here is Carney's full speech at WEF. In text www.pm.gc.ca/en/news/spee.... Half hour video with 15min talk (first bit is in French) then sits down for something of a Q&A www.youtube.com/watch?v=uStu... He's more 'statesmanlike' here than in skeet #4 ⬆️ where he's asked question by CBC reporter.

7/ Dude just announced a day ago he's agreed in principle to be part of the executive board for Trump's New World Order, and (again see #4 ⬆️) isn't disputing the $1-billion sign up cost, but sure it is a breakup (?!). I think the nondescript word people use for this is "pragmatist" or something...

He's NOT paying. NOT.

Has he said that, or that's your interpretation? The video I shared, he says a condition of paying is that humanitarian aid goes to Gaza.

LOL. I've got a bridge in Brooklyn for sale too.

He did not say he was paying. I think you have a comprehension problem.

What was the question, and what was his answer. He SURE didn't say he was NOT paying, lol.

He will not be paying to be on the board. He may provide some Gaza aid. Depending on how the funds will be used and allocated. That was his message. That is how adults talk.