Post

AND some OVERDUE ACCOUNTABILITY !

The American Council of Guardians

With lifetime appointments…..what kind of horse shit is that??? Term limits and age limits for all government jobs!!!! Enough already. JFC

This is a good proposal.

With this lawlessness, everything is on the table

Let’s go ahead and make it 26, 2 justices for each circuit. Cases are heard by 5 justices panels randomly selected, similar to circuit courts. Cases can be heard en banc.

The german high court system is split into multiple courts (6 of them). The court for constitutional stuff has 16 judges split up into two chambers sitting for terms of 12 years with mandatory retirement at 68. The final court of appeals for civil and criminal cases has 153 judges and 19 divisions.

My version is - 18 year limit as voting judge, after that you still get to hang out, have clerks, hear cases, etc. you just can’t vote on a case.

I didn't say it was a court.

This court no longer does law, it does corruption cloaked in legalese. The corrupts will soon to find a way to corruptly invalidate California’s redistricting, 100%.

Except I think Supreme Court has way more power.

All appeals go through the Court of Review. Anything they resolve by a 2/3rds majority (9-4 or better) is final; SCOTUS will have no jurisdiction over those cases. SCOTUS will review 8-5 or 7-6 cases. And SCOTUS can review only final judgments, not interlocutory appeals. No more shadow docket. 4/5

For a republic, America sure has a lot of royalty.

No. Sherrilyn Ifill and others have spoken about the commission’s cowardice and can kicking.

Yeah, because we've reformed it since then

Truth be told, I don't think there should be anyone under 40 on the supreme court. I want to seasoned jurist with experience and wisdom. Not some clown with a half ass record.

Time to limit terms. Some scotus judges have overstayed their welcome and lost their integrity

A 50 year campaign to foist religious zealots on our jurisprudence, as it turned out, had consequences.

It’s going to take something a lot more radical than that

They are OATHBREAKERS AND PERJURORS.

Need to vote Dems in and stop playing with votes. Lives depend on it.

The reform needs to be with our society and electorate, because that’s what caused this problem. Not a broken document. If we don’t elect horrible people, we’ll do better. It’s not that hard, and yet...

My fairly normie lib father is planning on bringing a "defund the supreme court" placard to the next no kings march

For a start, these measures could make sense: - term limits (and no second terms allowed) - two thirds majority required for confirmation

The Senate is anti democratic, and should be abolished. Or, randomly pick temporary Senators from the house for duties held only by the Senate.

They overruled a Trump judge, who authored the fifth circuit court of appeals opinion affirming the district court. It is stunningly bad.

This is how will backfire Dummy-mander. To create more republican districts the overall republican vote must be diluted. The reduced margins can create a scenario in a wave election where the shift overcomes the new republican majorities drawn in a map like this.

When the entire trump administration is null and void that should include his installations on the courts, all of them. They are no better than cabinet members.

They need to GO along with their Orange Jesus 🍊 for all their Corruption.

Almost as if they fly their flags upside down

SC does know that in a dictatorship they serve no purpose, right? At best they’d conduct show trials, but the idea that a court would ever make a ruling the dictator would disapprove of is laughable. Judges in Russia know who’s in charge, and it ain’t them. Facts & evidence don’t matter.

Time for a rejection. The entire court must be removed, investigated & charged to the full extent of the law if any crimes are exposed (in addition to the corruption already public knowledge). Then they must serve at the will of the people.

Both have members in the Epstein files.

The robed 6 are risking Marbury v Madison. That veto power was judicially created.

Houseboys of the lords

On both sides its a weak analogy. The Law Lords (the SCOTUS counterpart) were professional judges appointed in a non partisan manner Of the ordinary peers - capricious - is not a way I'd describe the house at all. Even in the past The present L's is far less partisan than the HoC (or congress)

I think there's a pretty crucial difference between a legislative body being partisan & a judicial one. The latter is far worse (imo). All law making is partisan to some degree. But all laws should be applied equally & fairly to everyone. I don't think the house of lords analogy is very good.

It’s time to eliminate the SUPREME COURT and reform the federal and state judicial system.

I think the point being made is that SCOTUS doesn't really act as a judicial branch. It just vetoes legislation it doesn't like along partisan lines.

Five of the Court’s nine members were installed by presidents who the people voted against. These clerics are fundamentally illegitimate. Defy their sham rulings, throw them in the trash where they belong.

...a house of blatantly racist white supremacists...yeah the self loathing Black guy too

Abolish scotus

This directly addresses the origin: garethgore.substack.com/p/opus-dei-a...