Post

i mean you can see the potential for change but you can also see the vast darkness and that you may not see substantive change within your lifetime being able to comprehend even slightly a complexity that you barely have the ability to affect

so much about systems change has to align for things to change on anything other than a decades+ timescale but for crisis events (and even in crisis events it's even odds on two steps forward, three steps back), so much is about luck and yet

I think part of the issue is that you can be a systems thinker-singular and then it feels like You Are The One Who Must Change It because You Can See but then again the whole point of the fellowship was that it was a Team Effort and you know exactly which one's the Boromir you're working with

2 reposts68 likes

like has anyone studied exactly how much lines up to produce systemic change because I'm pretty sure if you wrote it all out there *would* be the equivalent of "and then some fucking eagles turned up" only eagles are people doing regular people things but fuck me. eagles.

alternatively, you don't achieve radical change by changing a system, you achieve radical change by replacing a system with a new system

Honestly struggled with that a lot. And for a long time I've made it my responsibility to try to teach people to think this way. But it's also very much a lost cause most of the time. Sometimes I regret getting into systems thinking and cybernetics and mourn the lost innocence