Post

BrokenBanker
@brokenbanker.bsky.social

at the risk of appearing contentious, point of the piece (which I understood) could have been a 300 character post expressed clearly, and there would have been no pile on. but that's not an article for clicks. but don't then write said article, and be disingenuous afterwards about what you've done ?

Robert Smith
@bondhack.ft.com

I mean it’s in column form because she has a weekly column she has to write as part of her job lol. The tyranny of 850 words is that it’s both long enough to annoy people and short enough not to include all the nuance to assuage them.

0 reposts10 likes

BrokenBanker
@brokenbanker.bsky.social

yep, all understood there. surely the article is a success, huge engagement level, lots of people feeling interested enough to post their views in response. the fact a lot disagree with some of what the article said (or maybe how it was said), doesn't detract from mission accomplished.