Post

Ban on Palestine Action was lawful, court of appeal rules

theguardian.comBan on Palestine Action was lawful, court of appeal rulesJudges overturn decision of high court that government proscription of group under Terrorism Act was wrong The high court was wrong to rule that the ban on Palestine Action under anti-terrorism laws was unlawful, the court of appeal has concluded. A five-strong panel, including the two most senior judges in England and Wales, overturned February’s decision of the lower court that the proscription of the direct action group, the first to be banned under the Terrorism Act, was wrong. Continue reading...

Ernest "Dead" Penfold

@penfoldsfiv.eurosky.social

15 June

wild how in Starmer's Britain they'll let a bunch of Nazis attacking immigrants and burning their houses slide but boy howdy you better not object to genocide otherwise they'll crush you!

🆂𝖙𝖔𝖕 🆃𝖍𝖊 🅱𝖚𝖘

@your.buss.top

15 June

Does objecting to genocide absolves you from grievous bodily harm only, or can one rob banks too?

Matt Ayre

@matt85.bsky.social

15 June

This is such an asinine question.

Robin

@bobin.uk

How?

15/6/26, 5:46 pm0 reposts0 likes

Matt Ayre

@matt85.bsky.social

15 June

Who has been absolved of GBH for objecting to genocide?

🆂𝖙𝖔𝖕 🆃𝖍𝖊 🅱𝖚𝖘

@your.buss.top

15 June

No one, the court upheld the law. But you folks argue that these guys' crime was about political points not about violence.

Matt Ayre

@matt85.bsky.social

15 June

No, I argue your question was asinine.

🆂𝖙𝖔𝖕 🆃𝖍𝖊 🅱𝖚𝖘

@your.buss.top

15 June

Maybe in your head you do. In reality you folks argue that these guys crime was objecting to genocide rather than violent terrorist action. bsky.app/profile/penf...

Ernest "Dead" Penfold@penfoldsfiv.eurosky.social

wild how in Starmer's Britain they'll let a bunch of Nazis attacking immigrants and burning their houses slide but boy howdy you better not object to genocide otherwise they'll crush you!