Post

Gabbard: "My answer yesterday was based on my recollection or the lack thereof of the details that were posted there. What was shared today reflects the fact that I was not directly involved with that part of the Signal chat." (Note that Jim Himes isn't buying it.)

750 reposts3.3K likes

My lies, are based on my judgement, or the lack thereof of the proof that was posted in the Atlantic article. What was shared today reflects the fact that I am woefully unsuited and should not be directly involved with any Signal chat beyond deciding what to order on UberEats.

She says she cant recall what was in the texts when Dems ask her questions.She gives specific details of what was NOT in the txts (targeted terrorist’s name, location of strike) when Repubs ask her.She committed perjury yesterday AND today, when she says she “can’t recall.” She certainly can recall.

"Sir, as a senior member of this administration, we are required to juggle any number of falsehoods. It is difficult at times to keep straight all of them. I would like to update yesterday's lie with the new lie I was provided to give today."

Yeah. That's gotta be the funniest part... but he's on brand, the signal chat is paywalled and he spends an amazing amount of time even in the first article bashing Biden. Literally going to do everything he can do help Trump without going openly MAGA...

Al Green insists that The FELON does not have a mandate to cut Medicaid - and he's right Al Green - "I did it from my heart, and I will suffer whatever the consequences are," he added. "But truthfully, I would do it again."

The only fix for ALL of them - including the VP - is fire them all! There is no fix. This is their MO to prevent records of conversations. They’ll all, if they haven’t already, go to burner phones. They have no integrity to use secure devices.

I just rewatched it. She stated definitively, without hesitation and factually, that there was no classified information discussed. HOW ARE WE SUPPOSED TO TRUST A WORD SHE SAYS going forward??

The one good thing about all the POS maga women is that they are quelling the notion that women in power would automatically be better. One and all, these maga women suck all the balls. And, knowing that every accusation is a confession, that's probably how maga women get their power.

So, she’s saying that, despite being called to testify about the Signal chat that she was a part of, she didn’t review it. I mean, it’s on her phone. Right now. Open it up!

"My recollection...or the lack thereof". It's not a clown show. It's a clinic, a national convention, a 340 million person conference on why we need government, and why we need security clearances, analysts, specialists, etc. It's not a clown show, but to them, it seems like a joke.

Absolute Incompetent Administration. Absolutely no accountability. Absolute Worthless twats. Fight Fascism with everything you have. Freedom, Liberty, and Democracy will Prevail. #Fight #Fascism #Freedom #Liberty #Democracy

Her answer yesterday was a lie. She didn't expect her bluff to be called by Goldberg and now she is parsing words and phrases in an attempt to backtrack. This entire situation was a huge security risk and a massive self-own for the Trump admin. Sadly, this was completely expected.

Complete BS. If I were part of a text chain that was questionable, I would go back to look at what was written. She knew exactly what was contained in that chain. We are being lead & protected by unethical idiots.

In normal countries, that kind of security "riskers" would be locked up, until full investigation is done. They should not have access to secret data ever again. And they should not roam around freely getting rid of evidence of their crimes.

Idiots. Every foreign military organization in the world is now studying the Hegseth war chat to glean competitive intelligence and US military strategy nuances

If you didn’t know already, now you know that the horrifically unqualified director of national intelligence will not only lie to your face under oath, but when caught, will layer on more lies.

How stupid are these people? @jeffreygoldberg.bsky.social I have the whole chat but I don't want to release detailed battle plans. Trump's cabinet: Phew! We're safe to perjure ourselves about it at a Congressional hearing. Goldberg: I said I don't WANT to release it, not that I WON'T.

So apparently the exchange didn't leave an impression on her, and she had no objection to the conversation being on Signal, the presence of an unknown participant, or the war crime to which Hegseth confessed?