Post

The fact that this author almost fell for this is proof he is NOT as security conscious as he thinks he is. Did he read the email header details in full? Not the sender address but the header. The the obvious non-Apple URL that he clicked on. Sophisticated? Sure. But he failed basic security checks.

Apple uses DMARC and DKIM to ensure that their domains cannot be spoofed. These allow recipient email providers to properly identify the source of the emails. Reading the email headers (not the address but the headers, if you don't know what this is...Google is your friend) would make this clear.

The emails were actually from Apple. All header checks would show that it's legit. The attacker filed a fake support case in the victim's name and Apple sent a legit email notifying about that support case.

All of this is true… and in this case not useful since the email for the support ticket *came from Apple* because the attacker did in fact create a real support ticket on behalf of the target.

I smell stupidity here. Two factor authentication, twice, three times? No, it's not done that way. I'm glad I don't do Apple or any big OS company. They're too big not to hack. Don't ever trust any unsolicited call. Just hang up. Delete messges.

Snide responses as expected from "Professionals" "Rookie mistakes" - fuck off you arrogant twat. 99% of people would fall for this kind of multipart phishing attempt because there are to many moving parts to juggle in a normal life.