Post

I was inspired to try to answer the question posed in this post's title (even if that title was meant to be rhetorical). 2/ bsky.app/profile/tech...

Short answer is that storytellers care about story. Story, story, story. This is especially true in movies and TV. Story drives everything, not accuracy. And we care about stories about people. So AI characters are modified people; just like other movies have talking animals, talking cars, etc. 3/

One case where movies/TV have "gotten it right:" where humans have personal relationships with AI, but you don't need to interpret the AI as conscious. I enjoyed "Her" without believing that Samantha was conscious, and now it seems prescient. Black Mirror's "Be Right Back" as well. 4/

0 reposts1 like

This suggests a fun exercise: watch fictional sympathetic robots, but imagine them as mere chatbots: Data providing simulated relationships to humans; C-3PO + R2-D2’s bickering as generative performances of personality; WALL-E mindlessly following its programmed behaviors long after humans left. 5/

One thing I've noticed when writing on this topic is that my reference points skew pretty old; most examples in my essay are more than two decades old. (Plus the obvious gender imbalances.) Are there recent AI depictions with similar cultural or discourse presence to Skynet, HAL, C-3PO, Samantha...?