I wrote a little piece about how science fiction in movies and TV doesn't care much about accuracy or predicting the future, which is why it's not a good guide for understanding real technology. 1/ aaronhertzmann.com/2026/08/05/s...
Post
I was inspired to try to answer the question posed in this post's title (even if that title was meant to be rhetorical). 2/ bsky.app/profile/tech...
Why does AI in science fiction so often miss the mark? A few days ago there was an interesting post by Andrew Curran that got a lot of responses which was discussing why AI in science fiction often does not have the capabilities that AI already has in reality. I thoroughly agree with that take,…
Short answer is that storytellers care about story. Story, story, story. This is especially true in movies and TV. Story drives everything, not accuracy. And we care about stories about people. So AI characters are modified people; just like other movies have talking animals, talking cars, etc. 3/
0 reposts3 likes
One thing I've noticed when writing on this topic is that my reference points skew pretty old; most examples in my essay are more than two decades old. (Plus the obvious gender imbalances.) Are there recent AI depictions with similar cultural or discourse presence to Skynet, HAL, C-3PO, Samantha...?
Case in point bsky.app/profile/eryk...
Just putting this here so you all have something to add to your slide decks next semester