Post

@triggerloop.bsky.social

This doesn’t bother me because I think the film is doing something else and playing with some other ideas. I also think there is stuff in there to allow you to conclude it’s a bunch of gibberish but I definitely understand why people would and do feel this way

Richard Sever@richardsever.bsky.social

You Can See Everything "treats [Holmes'] misstatements as more debatable than they were...There are facts here, and they’re being brushed aside" www.statnews.com/2026/10/20/e...

statnews.comWhy I wish you didn’t want to see Nathan Fielder’s Elizabeth Holmes documentaryA reporter who interviewed Elizabeth Holmes on why society confuses authenticity, honesty, and truth, and how she takes advantage.

20/10/26, 9:00 pm0 reposts6 likes

@reallysmallfish.bsky.social

Don't think Fielder is going to do something straight up.

@richardsever.bsky.social

Yeah - otoh it is concerning if people go in thinking she’s a crook and come out less certain as Matthew notes.

@triggerloop.bsky.social

I get that but substantively does that affect anything

@richardsever.bsky.social

Probably not!