Post

I'm seeing this article a lot in my feed, and honestly, I think the arguments made here are very simplistic. So I've written a bit about it and also put some of my thoughts on AI in retro games into writing. toruzz.com/unlisted/202...

SEGA SATURN, SHIRO!@segasaturnshiro.bsky.social

Is there any harm in using AI to work on — or entirely create — projects for the Sega Saturn and elsewhere in the retro gaming scene? Yes, PandaMonium says in this opinion column, equating such work to digital asbestos: www.segasaturnshiro.com/2026/09/24/c... #sega #saturn #segasaturn #retrogaming

3 reposts10 likes

In all fairness, I did get corrected about the environmental aspect by a few people, and I do think it is a very very serious argument now, but the way the original article used the argument needs more work.

It’s a little frustrating to see you understand that the AI was developed unethically through theft but still defend its usage. You say it doesn’t make the tech inherently unethical, but yes, the models used right now *were* trained unethically. Using/defending them is an approval of this practice

Silly example, but can accept your phone (or clothing, chocolate, social media… you name it) was created unethically, and wish you lived in a world where it wasn’t, but still accept that using it is not inherently unethical. This is just a matter of choosing if it is or isn’t your battle.

I don’t eat chocolate but I understand what you’re getting at. My feeling is that we ought to push back against non-essential uses of AI if we find it unethical. Phones are connected to slave trade and also it is very hard to participate in modern society without one. Society does not need LLMs

You’re basically saying you want to use AI for fun projects that are also artistically satisfying and then saying “well we also use phones and those are bad too”. I don’t think we should just accept new tech when it’s so consequential to artistic communities and culture as a whole